• @Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    73 months ago

    Sanitizing and merging data sources isn’t some arcane art in which one needs decades of training to be proficient.

    Like I said: I do it every day.

    But go on and tell me how hard my job is; I’ll put it on my performance review.

      • @Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        53 months ago

        Then I guess I don’t understand what point you’re arguing.

        Because I guarantee someone would do the job if the data was available.

        • @KevonLooney@lemm.ee
          cake
          link
          fedilink
          -5
          edit-2
          3 months ago

          Who’s going to pay for that data from every tiny PD to be sanitized? Every PD will be slightly different and they may change vendors every couple of years. It sounds like a nightmare.

          My point is you don’t want or need “all the data”. You only want the 0.001% that involves use of force.

          • @Baahb@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            5
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            You have a bad take. Yes all of the data. If my offense are public information, then offenses against the public, mundane or severe, should be public.

            Edit: on retrospect, police conduct data should be public regardless of the public status of my or your record.

            Offences against the public should be documented publicly.

          • @Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            3
            edit-2
            3 months ago

            My job has clients who change vendors constantly, too.

            It’s not nearly as big a deal as you’re making it out to be, especially since you don’t even know if your unlikely hypothetical scenario even happens.

            So… Whatever I guess.