• @Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    53 months ago

    Then I guess I don’t understand what point you’re arguing.

    Because I guarantee someone would do the job if the data was available.

    • @KevonLooney@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      -5
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      Who’s going to pay for that data from every tiny PD to be sanitized? Every PD will be slightly different and they may change vendors every couple of years. It sounds like a nightmare.

      My point is you don’t want or need “all the data”. You only want the 0.001% that involves use of force.

      • @Baahb@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        5
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        You have a bad take. Yes all of the data. If my offense are public information, then offenses against the public, mundane or severe, should be public.

        Edit: on retrospect, police conduct data should be public regardless of the public status of my or your record.

        Offences against the public should be documented publicly.

      • @Zombiepirate@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        3
        edit-2
        3 months ago

        My job has clients who change vendors constantly, too.

        It’s not nearly as big a deal as you’re making it out to be, especially since you don’t even know if your unlikely hypothetical scenario even happens.

        So… Whatever I guess.