Libertarianism is a reactionary bourgeois ideology. It is contradictory to socialism. How they should refer to themselves is radical liberals. And the existance of “Authoritarianism” is questionable at best.

To condemn socialist revolutions and I’d argue even national liberations for protecting themselves from the siege that ensues the moment they succeed in their struggle is a deeply unserious take. So many of struggles across the world have been snuffed out in varying stages of their existence, and only those who centralized power had even a chance of living to see another day. The fault of these supposed leftists is to see socialism under siege and not condemn the empire but the victims of the empire and label them as “authoritarian”, “totalitarian”, “autocratic”, “regime” and so on. And then to romanticize the many failed revolutions and struggles because they didn’t even survive in the first place for them to condemn them later. it might be nice sitting in the safety of inaction and condemning everyone else for showing any resistance to empire and global capitalism while agreeing all the time with US sate department.

funny ha-ha or funny controlled opposition