• CanadaPlus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    edit-2
    2 天前

    Is it? I’m pretty sure there was total war already. Man, the Guardian isn’t what it used to be.

    Like, it’s an actual military target, and therefore hurts more for the Ukrainian war effort, but if anything it’s a de-escalation from hitting innocent civilians (like usual).

    • ohulancutash@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 天前

      For reasons of self-preservation, warring parties tend to hold off on attacking the main government buildings, unless they’re sure they can decapitate the regime.

      • CanadaPlus
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 天前

        In a hypothetical nuclear vs. nuclear war, sure.

        This is not that kind of war. Russia’s open goal is to eliminate the Ukrainian government by any means necessary.

    • CanadaPlus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 天前

      I have to wonder if that’d be target #1 if Russia did invade NATO. They don’t have the nukes, and the army, which does have the nukes, low-key hates them. Domestically, they exist to enforce obedience to Putin, which is something we have in common with Russians in disliking.

      Either that, or you send F-35s to hit all the same basic stuff as Ukraine has been. Which seems more likely, just because it’s less dramatic.

      • gravitas_deficiency@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 天前

        Tactically, it’d be (most likely) unescorted B-2s - or more likely, B-21s, since they’re not only even lower visibility, but also a good bit less expensive per unit, and the fleet is slated to be much larger than the B-2 fleet. F-35s do not have the legs to go in to Moscow and then get back to friendly lines (read: a place safe enough to aerially refuel).

        • CanadaPlus
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          16 小时前

          Hmm. Russia is pretty big, and I guess it’s unclear how close you’d want to fly your non-stealth aircraft to it. F-35s are at least some of what they’ve been doing in Iran, which is why it came to mind, but Iran isn’t really as much of an airborn threat, and has less strategic depth.

          The F-35 is listed has having a range greater than 1000nmi, which gets you from Moscow to central Europe. Not sure what load they’re assuming in that figure, though, probably empty. If you’re hitting a refinery in Omsk (or whatever they have in Omsk), for sure, there’s no question, it’s got to be a strategic bomber.

          There’s not really a reason not to use a bomber, if you’re absolutely sure it won’t be detected, I guess.

    • Rose@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 天前

      I doubt Ukraine will target that one, as it’s among the most obvious targets. I think one of the reasons Ukraine began to target the Wildberries warehouses in Russia is that Russia was probably hardening its defense of the oil plants. It’s like the Ukrainian incursion into Russia. Unexpected and forces Russia to reallocate resources, freeing up another direction.