• free_casc [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      50
      ·
      1 month ago

      For those unfamiliar: the “grand jury” looked at all the evidence presented by the cops and ruled “no crime has been committed here, we don’t even need to have a trial (with a whole other trial jury) because we dont see any possibility of crime”

      • TreadOnMe [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        35
        ·
        1 month ago

        In addition, “grand juries” are notoriously easy for prosecutors influence and get an indictment (basically a go-ahead to proceed to a jury trial). The saying among defense attorneys is that grand juries are so easy to persuade, even a mildy competent prosecutor could get a grand jury to ‘indict a ham sandwich’.

        So if they weren’t able to get it past a grand jury, they either had absolutely no case, screwed something up majorly in presentation, or these camera are extremely and universally unpopular.

        • MarxMadness [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          1 month ago

          Investigators, according to WKRC-TV in Cincinnati, identified Morelock after obtaining surveillance footage from other cameras near the scene as well as information linked to a credit card and a customer rewards account.

          Sounds like they had enough evidence – I’m betting it’s the “universally unpopular” explanation.

        • free_casc [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          27
          ·
          1 month ago

          People on here talk about doing some jury jullification if they every get selected, but I encourage everyone to go a step farther and research how they can apply to be on a grand jury in their local area.