In addition, “grand juries” are notoriously easy for prosecutors influence and get an indictment (basically a go-ahead to proceed to a jury trial). The saying among defense attorneys is that grand juries are so easy to persuade, even a mildy competent prosecutor could get a grand jury to ‘indict a ham sandwich’.
So if they weren’t able to get it past a grand jury, they either had absolutely no case, screwed something up majorly in presentation, or these camera are extremely and universally unpopular.
Investigators, according to WKRC-TV in Cincinnati, identified Morelock after obtaining surveillance footage from other cameras near the scene as well as information linked to a credit card and a customer rewards account.
Sounds like they had enough evidence – I’m betting it’s the “universally unpopular” explanation.
In addition, “grand juries” are notoriously easy for prosecutors influence and get an indictment (basically a go-ahead to proceed to a jury trial). The saying among defense attorneys is that grand juries are so easy to persuade, even a mildy competent prosecutor could get a grand jury to ‘indict a ham sandwich’.
So if they weren’t able to get it past a grand jury, they either had absolutely no case, screwed something up majorly in presentation, or these camera are extremely and universally unpopular.
There’s no defense presented at the grand jury, it’s just the prosecution presenting
Hence why defense lawyers despise it as a part of the process, because it predisposes the jury to believe that a crime was committed.
Sounds like they had enough evidence – I’m betting it’s the “universally unpopular” explanation.