• EnsignWashout@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    17 hours ago

    That’s…so far from something I was worried about, as GrapheneOS user.

    I guess it’s nice they did the legwork to set nuanced permissions, according to actual use cases. It would be great if that could catch on.

  • Auster@thebrainbin.org
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    For power-users: Are all third-party ROMs blocked?

    No. We currently support GrapheneOS when the bootloader is locked. We may support other third-party ROMs if:

    • They do not break the AOSP security model,
    • They support installation with a locked bootloader,
    • They properly configure and publish self-signed verified boot keys for their ROM, and
    • They promptly update to the latest AOSP patch level. We frequently update minimum operating system security requirements.

    If ROMs do not consistently adhere to the standards above, we will remove them from the set of supported verified boot keys.

    A lot of ifs, but I guess it’s a beginning?

  • Mugita Sokio@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    17 hours ago

    Never trust Roblox. They’re trying to save face, but privacy advocates see right through that pedophile in builderman.

    • CanadaPlus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      17 hours ago

      If this is a PR stunt, it’s the worst one ever. How many people have even heard of GrapheneOS?

      That said, I don’t know what it is exactly. Maybe one of us works there and made this a pet project?