• 2 Posts
  • 429 Comments
Joined 3 years ago
cake
Cake day: August 22nd, 2023

help-circle
  • I think we’re mostly on the same page, you just can still trust a Democrat, I guess?

    Let’s extend your analogy, though: the Democrats are shooting too, just not directly at me, at this moment. There’s plenty dead at their hands.

    I still might rally behind a Democrat to stop an authoritarian, one more fucking time.

    And I might not.

    We did this dance.

    Democrats do not stop the shooting.

    I am strongly inclined to trust a total stranger over an established Democrat.

    I am not alone in that.

    Even if a Democrat cared to save any of us, I do not believe that the Democratic party has the remaining influence to make any difference.

    The Maga crowd got something right: the average Democrat politician is spineless, broken and unwilling or unable to disobey orders from a secret cabal of pedophiles.

    If we could wake the Maga types up, they might realize the dumb fucks they’re worshipping are part of the same pedophile ring.


  • Through that lens, being the person that knowingly votes for some niche candidate that they know isn’t going to win any election against those two, knowing full well that by doing that you’re making it that much easier for the Christofascists to scrape out a win and continue pushing this morality horseshit on the people…no, you don’t get a pass. Not anymore.

    So when do we hold the democrats accountable for being openly detestable, if not when the they’ve handed the whole country over?

    Our only chance at this not getting worse is a likeable candidate. We know democrats are committed to never running one.

    What’s the answer here?

    Yes, the Democratic party running a true populist is the answer sure. We all know that’s not going to happen.

    The US Democratic plans to continue to eek out loses from the jaws of inevitable victory, and enjoy ongoing campaign funding and unaccountability, as their reward.

    This, what we have today, is literally their whole platform. They helped plan this.

    When do we hold them accountable for that? Is is still too soon?





  • Perhaps it’s just me, but to me this article feels like belittling the problem by not differentiating between “hated” products and “harmful” products.

    Exactly!

    Hated product? Oh well. My paycheck still cashes.

    Harmful product? Oh shit. Sorry boss. I’m still working on that. It’s been confusing, but we almost got it. Annnyyyy day now, boss. Pretty sure we will get it on track next sprint. Or the one after. (Source: I once got well paid to “accidentally” kill at least one truly shit-head idea. It probably cost me a pay raise, but I left soon after for more money, and I’m still proud of that every time I reflect back on it.)







  • Do you need a specific game mechanic for that?

    Not really, I suppose. But having it explicit can help players realize they have the option.

    “Concede” is also handy for situations where a player feels that their character winning this particular battle would be out of character.

    It’s a particularly helpful rule for cases where the player wants their character to do something particularly foolish, maybe to reach a specific story outcome, but still wants some influence on the final outcome.

    It can go along the lines of:

    Player: My character doesn’t have the brains to not start this fight, but even if we roll lucky and win this, it would feel broken. Can I roll an attack and then immediately concede?

    GM: Sure. What would that look like?

    Player: What if my character is disarmed somehow?

    Etc.

    I’ve seen where a few outcomes get discussed, and if the group doesn’t have a strong favorite, we just ranked them in order of luck, and then determined the full encounter with a quick single roll.