• dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    2 months ago

    Honestly, that’s awesome and should be the norm. If these fucking assholes are going to let people bet on random shit, they deserve to have random shit bite them in the ass. If they are letting people bet on EASILY gamed events, then they need to expect things to be gamed.

    • JustTesting@lemmy.hogru.ch
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      How does calling the bets on those platforms actually work? Is it employees that need to decide which outcome happened? And can anyone make a bet? If so, how do they keep up with all the bets and even just knowing that a bet is ready to be called?

      [edit]
      ok, i decided to research this myself (so much for the wisdom of crowds).

      some platforms have an admin pick what option was the outcome.

      And some have a board of traders that vote on what the outcome was(maybe with votes weighted by how many shares of some token they own…)

      so yeah, some admin on the platform or a few users are the ultimate arbitrer of truth, which sounds stupid to me. Especially since any ambiguity of the wording of the bet is up to them to figure out.

      this page had nice examples of kalshi and polymarket resolution ‘failing’. Was also not surprised that polymarket uses crypto for resolution, of course there’s crypto involved in this somehow… it really fits the online gambling theme

      • frongt@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 months ago

        Usually the outcome is determined by a consensus of reliable news reporting. In this case, it seems like they were using a local weather station.

        • JustTesting@lemmy.hogru.ch
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          2 months ago

          But the news papers don’t go and klick a button in e.g. kalshi. Someone/something has to collect the news sources and change the state of the bet to ‘resolved’. Either a human arbitrator, or some consensus vote by users or something like that? And that would already be very problematic, like what’s to stop the arbitrator from deciding in their friends favor?

          • frongt@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            0
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            2 months ago

            Humans on their staff. Hopefully, and not AI. And hopefully they have multiple people involved in resolving a bet to avoid that situation (but even if it happened, the people with money on it would absolutely riot, because they are watching almost all of them).

  • Black@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    People should bet “when is the next Luigi event where the Pedophile / billionaire died or killed”.