Ich hatte am Gymnasium die Möglichkeit, in den Fitnessraum zu gehen anstatt irgendwas-Ball zu spielen. Das hab ich sehr genossen. Und für die Lehrerin auch gût, dann musste sie sich nicht mit unmotivierten Kids rumschlagens.
Und ich war jetzt auch keine Sportskanone oder so, aber fitness mach ich 20 Jahre später immer noch und bin fitter denn je. Denke, das hat schon geholfen, etwas Interesse und eine Gewohnheit zu schaffen.
Ich dachte ja, das mit dem 5G Empfang klang ganz praktisch.
Ngl, I kinda want to get one to transform into a camping trailer. Become a traveling tea monk.
I hate this timeline
My personal pet peeve is everything having a ‘why it matters’ section. Not everything needs to matter, it can just be fun. I already clicked the link, no need to convince me. Also it’s often just restating the opening paragraph. And it makes everything sound like a marketing piece.
Oder hier so. 20k Einwohner, 10k Stimmberechtigt, an die Gemeindeversammlung kommen normalerweise 100-150, wenns hochkommt 300. Population ist eher links, Gemeindeversammlung rechts.
Da entscheiden rund 1% der Bevölkerung über den Steuerfuss, öffentliche Ausgaben(bis 8mio), Gesetze, usw,
Klar könnten mehr kommen, wäre aber rein vom Platz her schon nicht möglich. Und viele wissen nicht, dass es das gibt, dass da wichtige Themen besprochen werden, oder können einfach nicht mal schnell Montag Abends von 19-23 Uhr weg sein.
yes, agreed. And while right now its environmental impact is low due to renewable energy use, I have no doubt that if this caught on and had to serve more users, the environmental part would get just as bad as other LLMs.
I think you misunderstood, i thought it funny that meta is putting expensive GPUs into what amounts to chicken coops. Not that the article was wrong and there’s actual chickens inside
Are these just industrial chicken coops?
You know, this kind of thing:
There’s https://apertvs.ai/ probably as close as it gets. Government funded, made by universities. Afaik its datacenter is powered by hydro. But it is an academic project, so still uses common crawl and other publicly available datasets, which is considered ok practice in academia but still means consent is opt out, if something is publicly available. And of course no one uses this, because no marketing and it’s not as ‘good’ as models trained on stolen data.
Plus you could still argue that the energy and tax payer money could be better spent elsewhere.
flying penguin blog post on why that’s a lie
it’s only http traffic, not traffic in general, and it’s AI crawlers from the big companies, not agents running on behalf mf users.
Ja nice, bei dem Tempo sind wir bald alle Millionäre! /s
Same. I didn’t know that i needed her books in my life going in, but i absolutely did. Both the Wayfarer series and the Monk and Robot series are phenomenal
But the news papers don’t go and klick a button in e.g. kalshi. Someone/something has to collect the news sources and change the state of the bet to ‘resolved’. Either a human arbitrator, or some consensus vote by users or something like that? And that would already be very problematic, like what’s to stop the arbitrator from deciding in their friends favor?
How does calling the bets on those platforms actually work? Is it employees that need to decide which outcome happened? And can anyone make a bet? If so, how do they keep up with all the bets and even just knowing that a bet is ready to be called?
[edit]
ok, i decided to research this myself (so much for the wisdom of crowds).
some platforms have an admin pick what option was the outcome.
And some have a board of traders that vote on what the outcome was(maybe with votes weighted by how many shares of some token they own…)
so yeah, some admin on the platform or a few users are the ultimate arbitrer of truth, which sounds stupid to me. Especially since any ambiguity of the wording of the bet is up to them to figure out.
this page had nice examples of kalshi and polymarket resolution ‘failing’. Was also not surprised that polymarket uses crypto for resolution, of course there’s crypto involved in this somehow… it really fits the online gambling theme
In a way, LLMs have already taken my job as a software engineer. It’s not that they can do my job better than me. But they suck all the joy out of the field, they expose the almost religious culture around efficiency and velocity in the field (no, i don’t want to be 5% faster to make the boss richer and feel miserable doing it) and how little my peers care about craft and quality. Also why do those fucks have to lap up every new technofacist oligarchy thing with such enthusiasm, it pisses me off.
so it’s not that it does my job, but that it showed me how much i disdain this field now.
I’m thinking of switching to something (cnc) machining/cad related, both skills i taught myself and love , but i don’t know what kind of position could be suitable given my dev knowledge and lack of formal training. Plus i wouldn’t want to do the operator kind of work where all you do is put stock in the cnc machine and execute someone elses CAM, that seems too close to using LLMs in spirit. I do want and like creative work and tinkering.
[edit]
and I’m lucky enough to work for a university, so good work life balance, job security, pension, mostly meaningful work. Ironically enough in the AI field… But that makes considering to switch even harder. I could easily and comfortably coast along and feel discontent for many years to come.
Wouldn’t that just lead to splitting off of cheap companies, with pro-bono ceos that get paid more by the parent company through side channels? I don’t think there’s any fixing it with these kinds of laws, as they’ll just find loop holes to circumvent it.
maybe if companies were forced to be democratic so figurehead ceos could be ousted by the underpaid workers, but at that point it’s not capitalism, but socialism. and that’s how it usually goes imo, the workable solution to capitalism turns out to be not-capitalism
Get it to draw an ascii art nipple?
It’s always funny to me when people do add ‘confidence scores’ to LLMs, because it always amounts to just adding ‘say how confident you are with low, medium or high in your response’ to th prompt, and then you have made up confidences for made up replies. And you can tell clients that it’s just made up and not actual confidence, but they will insist that they need it anyways…
Hauptunterschied ist, dass die Bausünden nicht im sondern um den Stadtkern sind.