• PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    2 days ago

    Explanation: Not nearly as damning as it first appears! It’s a chapter in a reflection about Roman history by Machiavelli, wherein Machiavelli notes that men attempting to avenge wrongs done to women are often the seed of larger conflicts, and so such quarrels should be treated seriously by the powers that be, not dismissed as private squabbles.

    Still, what a title to open a chapter with!

    • RobotToaster@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      There’s a theory that Machiavelli, being an ardent republican, wrote “the prince” to deliberately give terrible advice.

      • PugJesus@piefed.socialOPM
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        I’ve heard that, though I’m partial, personally, to the idea that The Prince is sincere in its realpolitik, but outlining in part how autocracies must be brutal simply to remain operational, with occasional reference to the civic virtues of republics by contrast.

        But this is from his Discourses on Livy, I think.

  • Danarchy@lemmy.nz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 day ago

    “The first method for estimating the intelligence of a ruler is to check for foids”

    Machiavelli — The Princel