• AA5B@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    12 小时前

    Free will. The idea is that for free will to exist you must be able to choose the wrong action.

    If a supreme being rules out all wrong actions or prevented you from taking wrong actions, how could there be free will? How could you even be responsible for your own thoughts and actions. How are you not just a puppet?

    Alternately you can think of it as a leveling up. It seems like the Apple is always represented as “knowledge of good and evil”. So originally they’re just animals. They take actions but there is no morality, nothing is good or bad. But if they use their free will to take this one forbidden step, they receive the knowledge of good and evil, they can act good or act bad, they know it’s good or bad, and they have the free will to choose their path. And they are accountable for those choices. Now they’re human

    • SanguinePar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      50 分钟前

      But if god is omniscient, then he knows what they’re going to do. And if he already knows that, then do they really have free will? Or do they just think they do?

  • ActualGrapesTasteGreen@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    12 小时前

    Because you can say anything you want about a god that doesn’t actually exist. He could cure cancer, turn you inside out, and show you the inside of a black hole. Just pray and interpret silence as a “no” but that doesn’t mean he couldn’t if he felt like it.

  • FreddiesLantern@leminal.space
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    15 小时前

    Aha! The question that has many pastors digging deep to get a good answer too. And usually they end up with the age old “mysterious ways”.

    The “best” one is usually along the lines of: god wanted a relationship which involves choice and free will, so he had to create a division that would allow humankind to have a choice in the matter.

    So god feels lonely, causes all misery on earth that ever was and ever will be. Because free will… On top of that he also indirectly (oh screw it, it’s god) directly causes eternal torture in the afterlife for a vast majority of humankind. Because also, free will (I keep stressing that because that in itself is a huge problem for theologians).

    And then all that leads to god killing itself in the form of its own son. Because some of you touch your own genitalia in glee.

    Genius.

  • arielbnz@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    14 小时前

    Christianity is only one of the many interpretations of reality. Not reality itself. Other doctrines like gnosticism, hinduism, etc… Will give you another view.

  • magnetosphere@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    17 小时前

    Don’t try to apply reason/common sense/logic to ANY religion. You’ll end up with more questions than answers.

    Besides, I was told that the point of the story was resisting temptation. God wanted to see if Adam and Eve could do that. Spoiler: they couldn’t.

  • Lydon_Feen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    16 小时前

    God is also supposedly an all-knowing being, while at the same time excuses his shitty decisions and faulty creations with not being responsible for men’s actions and decisions, and also free will is a thing.

    Pick a lane. Either god is all-knowing and knows what every single human being who ever lived/lives/will live did/will do in their lifetimes and free will is an illusion, or he’s not an all-knowing being.

    Or… hear me out on this… He’s not real! Crazy, I know.

    • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 小时前

      If God created everything, who created God? And who created the thing that created God?

      Or, if God just sprang into existence, then the universe could have sprung into existence and saved a complicated and useless step.

  • Triumph@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    18 小时前

    And if Yahweh is omniscient, he knew they would eat it, so he put the situation together so that they could be “punished”,

    Yahweh is a sadist.

  • jordanlund@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    24 小时前

    It was a test, but if he was omniscient, he would have known the results without having to run it. 😉

    • Peppycito@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      22 小时前

      He wanted the result, but needed it to be our ‘fault’ for weird passive aggressive reasons and so he could hold it over our heads for eaons. “Sorry son, I’d drive you to the store but you ate that apple. Remember the apple I told you not to eat?”

        • Daftydux@lemmy.dbzer0.comOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          23 小时前

          Christians then start applying “ends justifies the means” logic.

          Calvin ball. Its all just Calvin ball.

        • Passerby6497@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          21 小时前

          Try telling that to a Christian and you’ll hear the battered wife type arguments come out sooooo quick.

          • halcyoncmdr@piefed.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            19 小时前

            I really enjoy reminding them that Satan only kills about 10 people in the Bible. He temps others to do things, but he’s only responsible for a handful.

            God on the other hand… much more direct and merciless. Doesn’t really seem to give a shit at all about killing people actually. Like a kid with a magnifying glass burning ants.

    • Monument
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      22 小时前

      Embarrassment kink followed by the lack of emotional regulation to handle the outcome of a scenario they asked asked for.

  • quediuspayu@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    23 小时前

    If I’ve learned something from listening History in the Bible podcast is that Yaweh is an asshole and that there are layers of bad translations.

      • Strider@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        21 小时前

        Yet here we are with rich assholes running the world and chasing the Antichrist story and trying to summon the end of the world.

        You’d think they’d be more intelligent.

  • zikzak025@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    edit-2
    21 小时前

    Just to add to the great answers already given by others, another aspect to it all is that the mythology that developed into Judaism/Christianity/Islam was originally polytheistic. The god known as YHWH/Yahweh was one of many, but had a dedicated cult (not unlike Greco-Roman deities that often had cults of their own, revering one specific god to the exclusion of others who were nevertheless acknowledged).

    So in that sense, the idea of Yahweh being omnipotent and omniscient is a bit of a retcon, meant to highlight the superiority of Yahweh over other gods as his henotheistic sect gradually developed into a more zealous monotheistic religion that rejected the legitimacy of all other gods entirely

    That being said, the idea of Satan as a sort of antagonist character to tempt humans towards sin did not emerge until much later either, after the aforementioned omnipotent/omniscient revision of Yahweh. It really just boils down to whatever plot contrivances were convenient for the successive works of religious fan fiction that would later come to be canonized within each Abrahamic religion.

    • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 小时前

      Worth remembering about the Gospels, which were all written decades later and served the purpose for which they were written (which was to speak to different groups at the time, which is why they all emphasized different things).

  • fizzle@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    21 小时前

    As in all theological questions, it really requires faith.

    If you have faith then you don’t need to worry about the details.

    If you don’t have faith then none of it makes any sense.

    • 🌞 Alexander Daychilde 🌞@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 小时前

      Faith comes up with answers and then tries to explain those answers. Faith changes reasons as necessary to keep the believed ideas believed.

      Science tries to explain observations and confirm theories. Science updates beliefs based on new information.

      Faith will always be wrong, behind the times, out of date. Science is constantly improving.