SDF Chatter
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
Matty Roses@lemmy.today to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 3 天前

EU parliament votes against scanning of private chats

www.patrick-breyer.de

external-link
message-square
22
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • privacy@lemmy.ml
  • europe@feddit.org
  • buyeuropean@feddit.uk
  • privacy@lemmy.world
  • technology@lemmy.world
  • privacy@programming.dev
  • PurchaseWithPurpose@lemmy.world
  • upliftingnews@lemmy.world
  • privacy@lemmy.world
333
external-link

EU parliament votes against scanning of private chats

www.patrick-breyer.de

Matty Roses@lemmy.today to Privacy@lemmy.ml · 3 天前
message-square
22
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • privacy@lemmy.ml
  • europe@feddit.org
  • buyeuropean@feddit.uk
  • privacy@lemmy.world
  • technology@lemmy.world
  • privacy@programming.dev
  • PurchaseWithPurpose@lemmy.world
  • upliftingnews@lemmy.world
  • privacy@lemmy.world
Historic Chat Control Vote in the EU Parliament: MEPs Vote to End Untargeted Mass Scanning of Private Chats
www.patrick-breyer.de
external-link
In a sensational turn of events in the fight against Chat Control, a majority in the European Parliament voted today to end the untargeted mass scanning of private communications. In doing so, the Parliament firmly rejected the error-prone and unconstitutional surveillance practices of recent years.

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.today/post/49179218

alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    55
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 天前

    Around 99% of all chat reports sent to police in Europe come from a single US corporation: Meta. US tech giants are acting as private auxiliary police forces—without any effective European oversight.

    Thats very interesting. Assuming that whatsapp is actually e2ee that means instagram, facebook and threads account for 99% of all chat reports. That means all dms on there have been getting scanned. Sounds like people should leave those platforms.

    • lumen@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      3 天前

      Not true for WhatsApp. It has a report function that forwards the last 5 messages in the conversation to Meta when used.

      • bless@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        3 天前

        Could it be that the client (who has the keys to decrypt the message) just forwards those messages when the report is sent?

        • lumen@feddit.nl
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 天前

          Yes, that’s exactly how it works.

      • unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        3 天前

        Didnt know that, i think i havent used it for over a decade.

    • Coleslaw4145@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 天前

      Or maybe people are mislead by (and putting to much trust in) the term “end-to-end encryption”

      Sure its encrypted in transit between you and the person you’re exchanging messages with.

      But that doesnt mean the Whatsapp app itself isnt scanning your chats on the phone.

    • RblScmNerfHerder@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 天前

      Yep. Ugh, garbage companies!

  • Twongo [she/her]@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 天前

    isn´t this like the 3rd time already? lol I talked to a few MEPs about chat control and other stuff - while the focus was on chat control the EU got this shit sneakily approved

    • hhg@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 天前

      Why is that bad? The linked article barely says anything

      • Twongo [she/her]@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        2 天前

        sorry, this should provide more context (german though)

  • RedGreenBlue@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    29
    ·
    3 天前

    The push for Chat Control is heavily driven by foreign-funded lobby groups and tech vendors.

    • huf [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 天前

      skill issue. have they thought about passing a “russian” (oooooh scary!) NGO law?

    • Scrollone@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 天前

      You don’t say!

  • MentalEdge@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    3 天前

    Thank fuck.

    For now.

  • 1984@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 天前

    Comes back again and again.

  • Telex@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 天前

    It’ll be back.

  • FoundFootFootage78@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 天前

    Is this AI generated?

    It has an m-dash and uses the phrase “hard facts”.

  • asudox@lemmy.asudox.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 天前

    Once again. In a few months, they’ll do the same and this will repeat until the law passes.

    • Voxel@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      3 天前

      You didn’t even understand the context. It’s about a law that already passed as temporarily and is about to run out.

      • Fossifoo [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 天前

        “Pressure is now mounting on EU governments to respect the MEPs’ vote” I do love Patrick for all the good work he does but doubt

  • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    3 天前

    To do this effectively, they’d have to ban facebook/whatsapp, which are the two most popular chat apps in Europe.

    • WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 天前

      not really. there are several ways they could implement it

Privacy@lemmy.ml

privacy@lemmy.ml

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !privacy@lemmy.ml

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

  • Posting a link to a website containing tracking isn’t great, if contents of the website are behind a paywall maybe copy them into the post
  • Don’t promote proprietary software
  • Try to keep things on topic
  • If you have a question, please try searching for previous discussions, maybe it has already been answered
  • Reposts are fine, but should have at least a couple of weeks in between so that the post can reach a new audience
  • Be nice :)

Related communities

  • Lemmy.ml libre_culture
  • Lemmy.ml privatelife
  • Lemmy.ml DeGoogle
  • Lemmy.ca privacy

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.53K users / day
  • 3.46K users / week
  • 7.69K users / month
  • 15.3K users / 6 months
  • 414 local subscribers
  • 47.1K subscribers
  • 4.73K Posts
  • 124K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • k_o_t@lemmy.ml
  • tmpod@lemmy.pt
  • Yayannick@lemmy.ml
  • ranok@sopuli.xyz
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org