• panda_abyss@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    58
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    This is stupid.

    We have that here in Ontario too. It’s fucking moronic.

    Ohh no, a cyclist, they’re ruining my commute by using the bike lane that doesn’t interfere with traffic at all!

    The only answer is to aggressively take the lane all the time. It’s legal, and it’s the safest option.

    It’s illegal to ride on the sidewalk, and it’s dangerous to ride on the shoulder. The shoulder is a great place to puncture a tire because it’s full of debris and glass and sometimes nails. It’s also got drainage grates that your wheels can catch in, parked cars, and there’s no protection from getting sideswiped by mirrors.

    In my city it’s also sadly common for trucks making wide turns to kill cyclists who are on their right.

  • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    2 days ago

    Easy solution expanded the sidewalks first into the street/lane. Then next year add a bike path (at sidewalk level) without actually taking away any car lanes.

    Alternative just pedestrianize the full street and then add in trams and loading/delivery.

  • dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    2 days ago

    Wow, I’m so used to the “small government” GOP in Texas using the state legislature to force cities into compliance with their dogma, it’s almost refreshing to see another horrible state do it.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      They totes are, fam.

      Liberal in the American sense, not in the rest of the world sense.