The first US service members to die in the conflict between the US and Iran were killed by a direct Iranian strike on a makeshift operations center at a civilian port in Kuwait on Sunday morning local time, a source familiar with the situation told CNN.

The death toll from that event at the Shuaiba port has since risen to six, US Central Command announced on Monday afternoon, after the remains of two additional service members were recovered.

Earlier Monday, Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said that the strike that killed the service members hit a “tactical operation center that was fortified,” but there was “one” projectile that made it through air defenses. CNN previously reported the event was a suspected drone strike.

  • deegeese@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    157
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 days ago

    6 US soldiers killed by a draft dodger trying to get us to stop talking about his friendship with Epstein.

    • Lodespawn@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      87
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      3 days ago

      Meanwhile how many Iranian civilians are dead? This should be in every headline discussing dead US war criminals

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      3 days ago

      I don’t think it’s the friendship he wants people to stop talking about though, i suspect it’s all the children he raped.

  • SirSamuel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    2 days ago

    Of course, if you’re fighting for your country and you get shot or hurt, it’s a terrible tragedy. Of course, of course. But maybe, maybe if you pick up a gun and go to another country and you get shot… it’s not that weird. Maybe, if you get shot by the dude you were just shooting at, it’s a tiny bit your fault

  • AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    How fuckìng dare they, amirite? Bombing those poor souls without a warning and even killing them… They are savages!

    Unlike us, who bomb a school and kill some brown kids who were clearly doing terrorist thingies and were a threat because reasons. That was absolutely justified and normal… right?

  • AlexLost@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    80
    ·
    3 days ago

    So iran strikes active targets in a warzone during a war and the super duper advanced US forces managed to bomb two schools in the first salvo. Brilliant. Who are the bad guys again?

    • Soulg@ani.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s very obvious that the US is the aggressor even if Iran isn’t a nice country, they were literally bending over backwards to meet our demands and it literally meant nothing. It’s infuriating

      • pishadoot@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Non native English speakers really struggle with at, on, and in. Don’t feel bad for being confused it’s super, super common, and most non native speakers will struggle with this no matter how fluent they become.

        For general example, if somebody is sitting inside an airplane, you can say they’re on the plane, or they’re in the plane. You could also say they’re at the plane, but that’s really only used in certain contexts.

        In the context you’re asking about, “at the port” at and in are synonymous, essentially. The article isn’t specific enough so it’s reasonable to assume that somewhere within the port’s boundary area, fence line perhaps, there was a temporary facility that was bombed.

        Since they used the term “at” though, it COULD mean that it was directly outside the port boundaries. Like right outside the fence, perhaps.

        Sorry. Not sure if any of this helps.

  • 0_o7@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 days ago

    Have we got an Epstein Fury Martyrs list yet?

    Their service serving interests of pedophiles and war criminals deserve recognition.

  • kreskin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    2 days ago

    Kind of like how the missiles sent into Iran would have been like, although at least the Iranians attacked US military buildings and not Iranian schools and hospitals like the zionists and their lackeys seem to have done.

  • porcoesphino@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    3 days ago

    No warning, no siren

    Why is this part of the title? It reads to me as making the attack seem more spooky and scary, but is there any other reason I’m missing?

    • Tiresia@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s a failure of US logistics/preparation. A more competent industrial military would have brought air defense. Starship Troopers was a documentary.

    • Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 days ago

      Well, in reality it is and should be more spooky and scary. Iran was paying attention to Ukraine. The US seems not to have. This was probably a drone strike. And it evaded the air defenses which were designed for missiles. Somewhere I saw a comparison. A $4 million per missle patriot air defense against a $20k drone. They can send a lot more for a lot less than the US and friends can shoot down. I am sure the US has some better anti drone tech. But probably not enough to protect everything. And it still isn’t perfect if they did.

    • EpicFailGuy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      3 days ago

      The US doesn’t leave personel exposed without anti air. Most bases have Patriot, THAAD and or CIWIS, at the very least an air raid alarm and bunkers.

  • WesternInfidels@feddit.online
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Maybe so-called Christians support the president because now we all get to be a little bit like Jesus: We can all die for his sins.

  • Mantzy81@aussie.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 days ago

    “If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
    Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs,
    Obscene as cancer,
    Bitter as the cud
    Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues,–
    My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
    To children ardent for some desperate glory,
    The old Lie: Dulce et decorum est
    Pro patria mori.”

  • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    3 days ago

    Wait are Israel and the US sending warnings and sirens ahead of their bombs?

    Or is this CNN writer just discovering what bombings at wartime look like.

    • Hegar@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      3 days ago

      Bombable locations often have air raid sirens to alert personnel to seek shelter.

      A “tactical operation center that was fortified” ought to have such a thing, whereas a “makeshift operations center at a civilian port in Kuwait” is much less likely to.

      The lack of warning speaks to the lies and poor planning of hegseth and other regime goons.

      • pulsewidth@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Appreciate the genuine clarification.

        I was really referring to the juxtaposed asymmetry of the experience between Iran’s populace suddenly wearing bombs and seeing a school of 100+ girls wiped out in an instant with the US-Israeli completely unannounced bombings (not even a declaration of hostilities), and then CNN crying foul at an unannounced bombing on a military target.