Every election we hear that Texas is in play and every election Texas stays red.
And every election, the Dem gets closer. MAGA has never been more vulnerable than they are right now, and the possibility of a flip has never been higher. With the right candidate, and a smart campaign, the Dems actually have the chance to pull it off this time.
Texas used to be an R+30 state and now it’s an R+8, with '18 bringing it to an R+2.
Harris County used to be the beating heart of the state party going back to the 1960s when Pappa Bush took over the organization. In '22, a Republican wave year with millions sunk into the county and Abbott jamming his thumb on the scale, Dems still swept every local race. Republicans retreated from multiple winnable swing districts - TX 7 and TX 29 - by packing them with Dems rather than splitting them up, resulting in a meager R+1 for the state as a whole in what should have been a GOP landslide. The surrounding suburbs were also stubbornly blue - from Tom DeLay’s old stomping ground of Sugar Land to Katy, Texas and Clear Lake. Dallas keeps flipping blue. The Austin blueberry keeps growing larger. And the enormous South Texas Hispanic population is still uncommitted to either party.
More recently - just three weeks ago - the Democrat Taylor Rehmet flipped a Texas Senate seat in deep-red Tarrant County by a decisive 14-point margin. This is a district Donald Trump won by more than 17 points in 2024.
You can poo-poo the idea that Texas will go Blue in 2026. And there’s plenty of historical evidence to suggest you’ll be right. But the idea that Texas isn’t in play is absurd. The Republican majority in Texas is being kept afloat in large part by the 2006 off-year gerrymandering (and repeated off-year re-gerrymandering) initiated under Rick Perry and repeated in the face of thinner and thinner margins. They have spread their voter base thin and run an increasingly unpopular mix of state level candidates for far too long.
And, as the state pivots towards a profitable investment in renewable energy and battery technology, even the old O&G bullwark is slipping. This has been a miserable year for historical GOP mega-donors. The state’s big investments in bitcoin mining have flopped. The Hispanic population (a historical tipping point demographic that has leaned Republican since Bush was governor) has been targeted by ICE raids for the last six months poisoning them to the Republican brand.
Tons of headwind in a state that’s an absolute must-win for Republicans. Dems would be stupid not to try and flip it.
People also forget Texas had a Democratic governor in the 90s, which is what caused republicans to start playing dirty.
And part of the Republican panic about demographic shifts making their party unelectable was Texas.
Texas being a battleground state for Republicans could doom the party to generational minority status.
Didn’t Betoblose by only like 2% or so? That’s very close. If California had a republican within 5%, the GOP’d sell their moms to buy ads.
Texas is a suppressed, nonvoting, fairly purple state. There’s always a chance and this year is probably as good as it could be since reformation.
2% after he wouldn’t shut up about taking everyone’s guns…
Talarico isn’t saying that tho, that’s why the FCC wouldn’t let him go on Colbert and why maga pushed the polls that had Crocket doing well, the very polls she cited as the reason for running.
Like, maybe it’ll backfire.
But I really can’t see how people could think the best candidate, is the one that never thought of running till Republicans told her to. The fact that she’s naive of what’s happening and just plowing ahead anyways doesn’t reassure me about how well of a leader she’ll be.
No questioning attitude, she’s going to be manipulated by someone, and her corporate donors likely already are whether she knows it or not.
She also takes AIPAC money.
Texas is a suppressed, nonvoting, fairly purple state.
It’s the turnout that kills us here. In 2018 when Beto nearly defeated Cruz, we had 46% turnout.Historically we have like 25-45% turnout of eligible voters in midterm elections, which are the ones where our state-wide executive offices are elected. We only breach 50% for presidential elections, and even then I think around 63% is the highest. The districts are so gerrymandered, I thin kit would be difficult to flip the state house even with a surge in voters. But if we can flip the Gov. Lt. Gov, and AG in a midterm then we’ll finally have some capacity to try and unfuck the district maps.
The turnout has a lot to do with our horrible labor laws and the absolute farce that is local media. There is never any communication or outreach by anyone to spread the word on local elections. It’s not that people don’t want to vote, it’s simply we don’t know when. If you aren’t constantly googling when your elections are we have no idea what is going on so it’s easy to see how people on the fence just don’t even bother.
Right, but it costs the republicans more money every year to keep it red, and that’s money they don’t have for other races.
I will say that in my twenty years of voting it’s moved from over a decade of “Texas will never” to “You’re saying there’s a chance?” and given their potential Icarian further gerrymandering that recently resulted in a some unexpected D wins, it’s progress.
However, I do tend to agree with you on this Senate race at this time so I’m just donating for the best but expecting the worst.
The DNC actually trying to win every race and the fact it started handing out money to do so over a year ago with no plans of stopping means a lot of these “any election now” races are all gonna flip at once.
It’s why primaries are so important, for a lot of races it’s gonna be tougher to win a primary than a general in 2026/2028.
What are Republicans not freaking out over? They seem to be a very over-reactionary people.
They should be freaking out about healthcare, the economy, the downfall of democracy, supporting a child rapist, etc.
What are Republicans not freaking out over?
Anything that actually matters
Except for that child sex trafficking thing, which is a total non-issue
I think the term was Snowflakes?
They like freaking out over social issues that don’t affect them, like the men currently on an anti-trans crusade.
They don’t like freaking out over actual problems we could fix in theory, like health care or income disparity. For those, they obstruct to stay relevant.
If Texas Republican voters give the nomination to Ken Paxton and then lose the main election, they thoroughly deserve the loss. None of the GOP candidates are good. But Paxton is a special kind of horrible.
Even if they win, its interesting that the GOP is so worried about losing Texas that they are dumping hundreds of millions of dollars into PRIMARY campaigns.
IfTexas Republican votersgive the nomination to Ken Paxton and then lose the main election,they thoroughly deserve the loss.I made a minor edit.
“Honestly, if you look at the polling in a general election setting, I don’t think it’s outside the realm of possibility that the seat [flips], depending on who the Democrats nominate,” said Senate Majority Leader John Thune
And I think we all know what he’s trying to say here.
Any cent they are burning in this primary will be missing elsewhere. Which is good. The more the GOP infights, the better.
So, in other words; Republicans who for some reason aren’t in on the latest election rigging scheme are freaking out.
May the suffocation of empathy, compassion, reason and accountability turn all red states blue! Reinstate the constitution! Reinstate law and order! Send the nazis packing!
They big scared of Talarico, as they should be
TV advertising is apparently still a thing. I remember Atari and dial TV with 4, 6, 12, and PBS on Channel 10 as the options, and this TV ad news is shocking.
Who watches TV ads? Besides Super Bowl viewers once a year.
It’s not the ads that’s helping…
Nationwide state party offices have been able to operate at campaign levels for the last year. And are set to thru the 2028 general election.
That’s better than an infinite amount of TV ads.
The article says they’ve spent millions on tv ads.
I had a milkshake yesterday…
It didn’t help anything, but it happened.
deleted by creator
demvote splitter Talarico
Uh, Talarico announced his primary candidacy 3 months before Crockett.
Looking at their responses on vote411.org and comparing my stances on istandwith.com, they’re like over 90% the same. Also, their policy positions really aren’t that far apart from each other. Crockett is rated as being pro-Israel, while Talarico doesn’t really have a record on that issue. And looking at polling for the general, https://www.realclearpolling.com/elections/senate/2026/texas, they’re both pretty even against Paxton and Talarico has a statistically insignificant better chance against Cornyn than Crockett.
Her candidacy demands doubled support in the face of regressive GOP vulnerability.
The GOP is literally the reason she’s running…
Meanwhile, the GOP worked behind the scenes to amplify the polls, according to the source.
The unnamed insider told NOTUS that the GOP helped “orchestrate the pile on of these polling numbers to really drive that news cycle and that narrative that Jasmine Crockett was surging in Texas.”
The mammoth effort even included an “AstroTurf recruitment process,” which blitzed progressive digital spaces with the polls.
Recruitment phone calls and text messages were also sent to voters, urging them to encourage Crockett to run.
“That was really a sustained effort that we orchestrated across the ecosystem for several months,” the source said. “Not only was it getting positive news coverage, but her office was directly having traffic driven to it in terms of phone calls urging her to run.”
Like, in case you’re wondering why people down voted you, it may be because you’re literally repeating maga propaganda here…
