LONDON, Feb 24 (Reuters) - Iran is close to a deal with China to purchase anti‑ship cruise missiles, according to six people with knowledge of the negotiations, just as the United States deploys a vast naval force near the Iranian coast ahead of possible strikes on the Islamic Republic.

The deal for the Chinese‑made CM‑302 missiles is near completion, though no delivery date has been agreed, the people said. The supersonic missiles have a range of about 290 kilometres and are designed to evade shipborne defences by flying low and fast. Their deployment would significantly enhance Iran’s strike capabilities and pose a threat to provide protection against U.S. naval forces in the region, two weapons experts said

    • mlg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      If China wants to, they can.

      They did it for Pakistan when they asked for their domestic PL-15s and it led to huge success in the air.

      They’re probably debating whether Iran can use them effectively or not. They don’t really have an airforce left, and ground launched missiles could be destroyed before they ever launch.

    • CanadaPlus
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Depends which kind you mean. They have rockets, but this is a cruise missile. Technically a Shahed is a cruise missile, but it’s not jet powered and it’s definitely not supersonic.

      • CyberMonkey403@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        16 hours ago

        I meant that ballistic one they lobbed at Israel in June 2025. Can’t find the details right now, but I distinctly recall it to be a short-middle range ballistic missile

        • CanadaPlus
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          6 hours ago

          Yeah, their rocketry expertise is good - they export it to other nations, actually. The point of moving away from ballistic missiles and their predictable trajectories here would be to avoid interception.

  • CanadaPlus
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 day ago

    This isn’t the hypersonic kind, to be clear. And I kinda doubt it will matter given how long they’ll take to deliver and how on the ropes Iran is.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      I see little evidence of Iran being on the ropes actually. The color revolution attempt failed, they managed to clean house, and they demonstrated during the 12 day war that they can hit Israel and US assets easily.

      The US also has a massive logistics problem with Iran being half way across the globe from the burger reich. A quick knock out blow is not possible, and Iran has the advantage in a protracted conflict because it’s a large country with logistical depth.

      It’s going to be far harder for the US to fight Iran than it is for Russia in Ukraine. And that’s been going for 4 years now.

      • CanadaPlus
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        4 hours ago

        12 day war

        Annoying that you’re using the Isreali name. It wasn’t a war, it was a brief scuffle Iran chose to break off.