• Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    1 day ago

    Microsoft leadership genuinely truly believes AI is the future instead of a massive fucking blackhole and scam.

    This AI ghoul is being placed in charge of xbox in order to bring AI to their features in an all-encompassing way, making AI the very foundation of the entire brand.

    It is going to be spectacularly bad.

  • Damarcusart [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    ·
    1 day ago

    Let me guess, they picked her specifically so that when things crash and burn, the freeze-gamer types will be so furious about the WAMENS that they won’t even consider examining why microsoft is shitting the bed, and instead just blaming woke for it.

  • invo_rt [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Saying nothing about this person in particular, leadership does not require knowledge of the thing you’re overseeing. It doesn’t hurt, but it’s not like Mr. Gamer himself Phil Spencer didn’t oversee the crashing of the entire brand.

    A lot can be said about Xbox and the state of the gaming industry writ large, but it’s clear to me that Microsoft is done with Xbox as a physical platform. Given the state of the hardware market, there is probably little internal appetite to do something as resource intensive as a full console launch.

  • Strayce
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    I’m still not clear if she’s an executive in charge of AI or an AI simulated executive. Neither would surprise me given Microsoft’s direction at the moment. Has anybody counted her fingers?

  • TheBroodian [none/use name]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean, not to totally disregard your title, because you may absolutely be correct about that, the same is true of every other video game company CEO as with this one, I’m pretty certain.

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Don’t you love it when you are working for a big company, and they announce that the new CEO is from Coke or Pillsbury or Ford or some other industry that has nothing in common with yours, but somehow just doing the same job as the last know-nothing that they fired, using the same current popular experimental business strategies, is going to be better this time?

      And then they pay them millions to fuck it all up, while they pay you a pittance to try to keep it together, as they fuck it up.

    • octobob@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s a thing with CEOs in all industries. Like I used to work for a manufacturer of machines that recycled plastics. We had the same CEO in Sweden goin back to the 90’s that was very entrenched in that hyper specific industry but he was fired. He was replaced by someone who’s previous background was being a CEO for a company that made standing desks.

      • blobjim [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Only if you buy games immediately when they come out. They’re fairly cheap if you play games that came out 2 years ago. The pricing model seems to be geared around kids getting the latest game as a gift or with allowance or something. And psychological manipulation if it’s a free-to-play game.

        • moss_icon [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          It depends on the company/game I’m guessing. Space Marine 2 came out 2 years ago and is still £60 on PS5. Most of the old Call of Duty games are still £40-50 on the PS Store as well. Baldur’s Gate 3 is still £60. Assuming the discs are cheaper but I don’t really have the storage space for them anymore, so I’ll just stick to the games I already own. I don’t get bored of Minecraft or Skyrim much anyway.

          • blobjim [he/him]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            12 hours ago

            Games are definitely more expensive on consoles. Especially games exclusive to Nintendo. PCs are of course much more expensive to buy. So maybe it’s only true of games that don’t have a graphics-intensive art style.

      • Goblinmancer [any]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Video games should really just be stuck on 2010- 2016 graphics.

        Most modern AAA game takes like 32 gb ram to not play under 30 fps at the very least. Maybe their logic is if their game is like unplayable without really good pc or ps5 that means their game would be less likely be pirated, but that ends up just not having people buy in the first place.

        Meanwhile games like terraria minecraft even dare i say it league are like most popular games ever and i believe part of it is that you can actually play them on something like college laptops.

        • moss_icon [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          12 hours ago

          The video games I play most often are still Minecraft and Skyrim due to price and storage requirements. Last year I started a Minecraft “forever world” for the first time and have been enjoying building in it.