“Yeah we know you did your reporting and wrote a whole article about it, but here is a 2 minute clip that the brain rotted population will more easily digest that tells them otherwise.”
HonestReporting or Honest Reporting is an Israeli media advocacy group. A pro-Israel media watchdog
…
HonestReporting is not a news organization, and therefore does not seek to follow journalistic ethics and standards.
Let’s see what the website Lemmy.world did a fundraiser for has to say about it
I love basing all media criticism on one guys opinions.
no it’s not one person it’s a system that’s published the methodology and so scientific. - mbfc die hards
we use metrics that are simply based on our opinions and no we won’t show our actual data - mbfc
given how much control over political discourse the epstein illuminati had in the files; i’ve been wondering if .world & piefed were their response to the lemmyverse and if they engineered lem.ee’s demise because of its relatively staggering growth.
.world describes itself as a general server. Something most people look for when registering an account
Piefed has a far superior front-end to Lemmy (and fixes the crossposting plague which Lemmy has had for years now).
I don’t think it’s worth blaming them for anything as much as them providing an alternative to Lemmy’s longtime obvious flaws, which at this point I’m not sure are ever getting fixed. They sure are libbed up though.
Overall, we rate HonestReporting Right-Center Biased based on support for right-leaning nationalist political parties. We also rate them as Mostly Factual rather than High due to the promotion of nationalist propaganda.
Weird how places they dislike get massively lowered for that, and their own rating system says it should be disqualification
Factuality Rating Levels
0: Very High – Consistently factual, uses credible information, no failed fact checks. 0.1–1.9: High – High factual, minor sourcing issues, reasonable fact check record 2.0–4.4: Mostly Factual – Generally reliable but may have occasional fact-check failures, transparency, and sourcing issues. 4.5–6.4: Mixed – Reliability varies; multiple fact-check failures, poor sourcing, lack of transparency, one-sidedness. 6.5–8.4: **Low – Often unreliable; frequent fact-check failures and significant issues with sourcing, transparency, propaganda, conspiracies, and pseudoscience promotion.** 8.5–10: Very Low – Consistently unreliable, heavily biased, with intentional misinformation likely.It’s interesting how they rate Drop Site News as being more biased and on par factually as HonestReporting (even though dropsitenews does real investigative journalism):
Its reporting is rated Mostly Factual due to one-sided narratives shaped by its strong anti-war stance
Their criticism of Drop Site’s factuality is not that they’ve gotten the facts wrong, but that the facts they report do not align with a pro-war narrative.
Yeah it’s wild some of the reasons they use for why they rate things how they want. Only surprised there they didn’t use to rank dropsite even lower
Wait. There was a fundraiser? 😳
Yeah back in the MBFC bot era it had messages to donate to MBFC on a bot that spammed every single thread.
Didn’t last very long though the user pushback was immense.
Cheers
And if you’re looking for an answer, you can find it in the video below:
Jeffrey Epstein has lots and lots of emails with Ehud Barak. The same Ehud Barak who was the top military guy and prime minister of Israel.
So yes, Epstein was an Israeli asset.
That’s not evidence though, that’s just something that happened. It wasn’t blessed by gobbels.
Epstein and Ehud Barak have more emails and messages between them than my girlfriend and I.
yes, but who would you rather believe, bibi or your lying eyes?
Removed by mod
