• Hawanja@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    15 hours ago

    Wait I’m confused, are they trying to ban the Girl Scouts?
    Or is this like, the organization formerly known as “Boy Scouts” is just “Scouts” now, (like it’s Co-ed scouts) and the chuds are pissed at that because boys are now playing with girls?
    Jesus, these fuckwits get pissy about the stupidest fucking shit.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      It’s the second one. Girl Scouts they have a separate beef with, I’m sure. But this is about Scouts being accepting of girls, because that "violates "DEI, because these assholes have decided they have a ZERO TOLERANCE POLICY on tolerance.

      I wish I was fucking kidding.

      I hope all the pious jackasses that told me (and keep telling me) that Kamala/Biden was just as bad are fucking happy with themselves…

    • buddascrayon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      14 hours ago

      It’s the organization formerly called the “Boy Scouts”. The Girl Scouts is a wholely independent organization that doesn’t, to my knowledge, receive money from the government to operate, hence Girl Scout cookies as a revenue source to fund activities.

  • Aonifall@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Does Hegseth know that the scouts aren’t part of the military and they’re a private organization? I’m just wondering because he doesn’t know much, especially when it comes to the military.

  • GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    Bitch, please. They weren’t scared of the Mormons, and they took an even bigger financial hit for breaking up with them. You think they’re gonna be scared of you? In this climate, the instant they announce cutting ties with you, fucking Taylor Swift or Mark Ruffalo will swoop in.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 day ago

      Hell, these are the same people that are obsessed with where other people poop.

      Also, Hegseth concerns himself with facial hair, so…

  • ShellMonkey@piefed.socdojo.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    169
    ·
    2 days ago

    The relationship between Scouting and the Pentagon is also codified in law, which states that the Pentagon must seek a waiver from Congress if the military intends to cut its support, and explain why giving that assistance “would be detrimental to the national security of the United States”.

    I love how they tag this minor detail onto the very end where they have to publicly justify it to congress rather than just doing whatever autocratic whim they feel like.

      • Einskjaldi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        27
        ·
        2 days ago

        If you get eagle scout you get a small raise when you join the military, same as if you had an associates degree.

        • Yeather@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          10
          ·
          1 day ago

          You recieve the same bonus for a few different things. I think the girl scouts gold award and sea scouts quartermaster award give the same enlistment rank bonus.

      • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        1 day ago

        Scouts does do a really good job of preparing kids for the military if they so choose. Many of the hard and soft skills it teaches are very military-esque. Or put another way, I was chatting with another parent who’s oldest just joined the military at 18 and they said the training is just like scouts and credited scouts with preparing them well for the military

          • BanMe@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            15 hours ago

            Sort of depends on your troop. As a young teenager we had to endure winter survivalist training which included building usable sleeping quarters in the sub-zero snow and spending the night in them, by yourself. Yes you could come back to the main building but you failed at the training if you did. Actual chance of freezing. They gave you a styrofoam cup half full of chili but otherwise you were on your own for sustenance too, including water. It did give me a sense of independence, but also a fear of the cold.

      • Ageroth@reddthat.com
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        2 days ago

        It’s not really teaching Boys to Scout, it’s a program that is Scouting for Boys who are likely to do well in situations similar to the military, albeit a less modern one than exists today.

        • Gathorall@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          If deployed in significant numbers those skills are almost as useful in a modern military as a century or two before. An Ukrainian or the Russian soldier didn’t need those skills in the barracks or having guard shifts, but it is sure nice to know now.

  • Basic Glitch@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    Ah yes, return to the roots of boys will be boys

    “For more than a decade now, Scouting America’s leadership has made decisions that run counter to the values of this administration and this department of war, including an embrace of DEl and other social justice, gender-fluid ideological stances. This is unacceptable,” Mr Parnell wrote on social media.

    What were they up to before that decade?

    Scout’s Honor

    In February 2020, the Boy Scouts of America filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. By the end of that year more than 82,000 former Scouts had come forward with claims of sexual abuse that took place during their time as members of the organization — meaning, of course, when they were minors. Their claims span across decades and generations, all over the United States.

    I know not everything they do relates back to protecting the wealthy global pedophelia network, but honestly this probably does.

    There were even troops where boys from unstable homes were targeted and recruited by “scout leaders” with the promise of offering them better lives.

    New Orleans Boy Scout Troop 137

    The scoutmasters preyed upon children from unstable backgrounds and used them for child pornography and their own sexual pleasure, as well as pimping them out to pederasts in and outside of Louisiana.

    By May 1977, nineteen men were charged with abuse in relation to Troop 137. According to then-district attorney of Orleans Parish, Harry Connick, the clients had abused other children in thirty-four different U.S. states, as well as in England. Contacts of the troop to pederasts abroad, as far as Saudi Arabia, were discovered, as were filing cabinets full of letters dating back to 1956 of men requesting access to boys.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      21
      ·
      2 days ago

      This is the truth. It’s stupid culture war shit all the way down with these guys. Harmful stuff that will do nothing but help a few angry incels jerk off to “owning the libs”, but providing nothing of value to anyone in the country except for billionaires.

  • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    ·
    2 days ago

    I would like to point out that Kegsbreath was not a Scout.

    Also, even if he was, how having girls in the Scouts affects him, personally, is a real mystery.

    • lightnsfw@reddthat.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      1 day ago

      I was in scouts. People brought their sisters to meetings all the time. They joined in whatever we were doing and it was fine. I also went on a couple girl scout trips. I don’t even remember how that happened but we had a fun time. Most of the girls I met as a kid and remained friends with through my teens I met through scouts. Good experiences all around.

      • Almacca@aussie.zone
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        Good experiences all around.

        Hegseth can’t be having with any of that nonsense!

      • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        2 days ago

        GS are just cookie dealers that sometimes go camping. Between my two kids each being one or both programs the GS spend 70% of their meetings and time together talking about and planning cookie sales. The Scouts go on twice as many camping trips and only fund raise around Christmas. But one kid whom is in the more camp group is in the richer areas troop meanwhile the GS is in the lower income area so they tend to just try to make money.

        My point in GS is for the kids you want to someday be in sales and the Scouts are for the kids who want to experience the outdoors.

        • Fondots@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          edit-2
          1 day ago

          A big part of the problem with girl scouts, in my opinion, is that a lot of the time the troops are kind of temporary.

          Usually group of girls and their parents (usually moms, who may or may not have any scouting experience of their own) start up a troop, more-or-less from scratch when the girls are brownie or daisy-aged, and then that’s pretty much it, they don’t really do any ongoing recruitment, it stays just those same girls until they all either quit or age out of the program and then the troop dissolves.

          Meanwhile, the (boy scout) troop I came up through is going to be celebrating its 100 year anniversary in a year or two. They have a garage full of troop gear, money in the bank, and decades of institutional knowledge of how to be a scout and how to run a scout program. We had one or two kids whose or father and I think even grandfather had earned their eagle from the same troop, the current scoutmaster was in the troop a couple years before me and his kids are in it now, the one before him was already scoutmaster when I started before his kid was old enough to join and stayed on for a few years after his son aged out, and every year we got a new batch of kids joining, some years more than others sure, but there was always new blood coming in

          So there’s a lot more continuity and something like generational wealth going on with the BSA. Girl scouts generally need to hit the cookies and fundraising hard because they’re often kind of starting from 0 (not that there isn’t some valid criticism about how the cookie sales work and how the money is distributed and used, but I don’t know enough about that to really go into it)

          And as far as recruitment, boy scouts made it really easy to find a troop, there’s a website you can go on and find all of the ones near you, so if your kid just suddenly wanted to join, or if you moved and needed to find a new one it was dead simple to look that up. At least at the time when I was in, girl scouts didn’t really have anything similar, unless you were already in the know about when and where the existing troops met you were kind of SOL if you wanted to join one. I remember one of our leaders talking about some sort of community event they were trying to put together, they had some representatives from a couple other local organizations and other scout troops and such coming, and they wanted to see if any of the local girl scout troops would want to take part, but he just couldn’t get in touch with any of them, couldn’t find contact info, when he reached out to their local council they basically stonewalled him

          And unfortunately just by the nature of it usually being the moms who are the involved parents with girl scouts as opposed to usually the dads with boy scouts, there’s often a bit less outdoorsy knowledge to build on (some of my best hiking/camping/fishing buddies are women, but until I was the one who started inviting them out, a lot of them had never done much that kind of thing, and unfortunately that’s not a terribly uncommon situation, whereas guys tend to be more likely to grow up doing that sort of thing with their dads)

          All that said, I’ve known a decent amount of girl scouts, and while a lot of them got stuck with shitty programs, there were a handful that actually probably went harder than we did in boy scouts. The odds aren’t exactly in your favor of ending up in one of those girl scout troops, but with the right parents, kids, and resources they actually can put on a really good outdoor program (and their campgrounds are usually really nice as well) they just don’t have the systems in place to make sure that all of their troops are able to do that to the same extent boy scouts can.

          • GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            1 day ago

            This is an extremely well thought-out comment. As someone with experience in both camps (literally), you hit the nail on the head here.

            • Fondots@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              14 hours ago

              Yeah, and I also think that the sort of temporary nature of most girl scout troops also hampers, what I think, was one of the most key parts of the boy scout program- the idea of “boys teaching boys” (I suppose they may phrase it more like “kids teaching kids” now)

              The older kids in the troop took a really active role in running the program. Often we’d pretty much just get sort of a list of bullet points from the adult leaders for what we needed to accomplish and it was up to us to figure out how to make it happen, put together a plan, delegate responsibilities, and get the younger kids up to speed, while the adults stood by off to the side somewhere pretty much just making sure we didn’t do anything too stupid.

              Not all of us were exactly natural-born leaders, but because of that sort of organizational structure we all kind of learned some passable leadership skills.

              But without that ongoing recruitment and the kids of different ages being active in the troop together, that kind of youth leadership can’t really happen to the same extent

              I’ve also heard some things, and I have no clue how true they are, about their adult leader training being a little excessive, like there’s separate classes you’re supposed to take before you do pretty much anything, like you need to take the training before you can go on a camping trip, and then there’s a second training for if you want to have a campfire, and another if you want to go on a hike, etc. and I believe those are all trainings you would need to pay for

              So if that’s true (and it may not be, this is half-rememered info from probably about 2 decades ago) that does put a pretty high barrier of entry for a lot of people.

        • Trainguyrom@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 day ago

          I was attending the informational sessions from both GirlScouts and Scouts while trying to make the call for our daughter and the tone shift was jarring, where GirlScouts it was all “we’re going to sell cookies and learn important things you need to know as a girl” and became honestly kinda sexist and just tried to badmouth Scouts when I asked how it compares. Meanwhile Scouts it was just “look we’re going to go hiking and camping and make a race car to race and have fun!” (and had the exact same answer when I asked how Scouts compares to GirlScouts)

          So yeah we ultimately went with the more inclusive option that didn’t recoil at the idea of her wanting her brother who she adores to join and didn’t turn to badmouthing the alternative when asked how they compare. And guess what, she’s having a blast and it feels weird that it was ever a gendered thing in the first place!

        • AbidanYre@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          2 days ago

          Girl Scouts is much more troop driven than boy scouts. It kind of sounds like your girl’s troop leader just isn’t very motivated.

        • GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          Scouting America teaches kids how to be soldiers. Girl Scouts teaches girls how to be ruthless boardroom headhunters.

          So really, the difference is minimal.

  • Gammelfisch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    1 day ago

    The MAGA asswipes would like to transform the Boy Scouts into their version of the Hitler Youth, Young Pioneers and other fucked-up youth groups for brainwashing purposes.

    • GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The Mormons used it specifically for indoctrinating young men into their own cult for decades. They were BSA’s biggest sponsor for fucking ever, since participating was mandatory for Mormon boys. Breaking ties with the Mormons over gay rights was a big fucking deal. It was a cultural nuke at the time when I was in Utah.

  • MerrySkeptic@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    Just going to comment here to avoid some misconceptions. Apologies for the long comment. Tl;Dr, Boy Scouts and Girl Scouts are not part of the same parent organization.

    Scouting America is basically a rebrand for Boy Scouts of America. The rebrand happened when they began to admit girls into the program, like 8 years ago or do. Many people get confused thinking that Boy Scouts of America and Girl Scouts USA are partner organizations when they are not. They are two independent programs with different missions and values. For example, Boy Scouts has maintained Declaration of Religious Principle which requires to members to sign an agreement that states that they believe in some sort of higher power. They also include a Duty to God in their Scout Oath. Girl Scouts on the other hand is a secular organization that does not require a belief in any higher power but does encourage members to explore their own faith if they have one.

    The decision for BSA to admit girls was a controversial one even within the organization, but their numbers have been flagging for a while and they felt that allowing girls in would help. There was also a more progressive wing within the organization that recognized how discriminatory this was and wanted to reform the organization. Joining Boy Scouts, with an organizational emphasis on nature, citizenship, and skill mastery, would be a different experience for girls than Girl Scouts, which allows troops to pick for themselves what they want to focus on to develop leadership and confidence and often doesn’t include camping at all. Many girls joined Girl Scouts expecting it to have the same focus as Boy Scouts, would be disappointed, and then drop out. This could give the Boy Scout experience to girls.

    In order to make this happen, it was agreed that girls would have separate troops from boys. They could share resources but each troop would have their own youth and adult leaders and would need to camp in separate sites. It is not like they are sharing tents or anything like that.

    So that’s why it is obvious to me that the Pentagon taking this stance is clearly regressive and just trying to be anti-woke and going after an easy target. The military is already coed, so why not give girls the same support and experiences that boys can have in Scouting? Its just another red flag that they want to prevent women from advancing in the military. They know that Scouting America is in a tough spot and thinks they can either get them to regress and tacitly endorse anti-wokeness or be made an example of.

    There’s another recent change in Scouting America that was also controversial and seen as woke that the article doesn’t address. Following the George Floyd protests Scouting America came up with a new merit badge that would be required for any scout that wanted to reach the rank of Eagle: Citizenship in Society. This badge explicitly discusses racial injustice and teaches Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion principles. As you can imagine, this did not sit well with conservative members and many left in protest (though many had already left when girls and gays were allowed). There have been a few different new organizations attempting to recapture the old school Boy Scout mentality with a doubled down emphasis on gender exclusivity, religion, and pure meritocracy without any regard to positions of privilege. They are growing and I suspect one will try to replace Scouting America as the youth organization of choice for the military.

    • ThePantser@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      The troop my boy is in made the decision to be boy only but the troop one town over is mixed and they all camp in the same site with both boys and girls. So they don’t have to be gender separate.

      • kata1yst@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        edit-2
        1 day ago

        Correct. The Dens / Units inside the Troop need to be gendered and have separate adults according to the rules, but actual applications of the rules vary in my experience.

        My apologies, my information is out of date. Gendered splits only happen in 5th grade for cub scouts now.

        • overthere@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 days ago

          This isn’t true either. There are rules about leaders of the same gender as the scouts present in certain situations, and separation in tents and bathroom/shower situations, but dens and patrols can be mixed gender

            • Fondots@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 day ago

              I’m wondering what exactly counts as a site for these purposes

              I’ve been out of scouting for a long time now so I really don’t know how they’re working it

              But I feel like different patrol areas at a lot of BSA summer camp sites probably offer more privacy and separation than there is at 2 adjacent sites at some non-bsa campgrounds.

              I know at the summer camp my troop usually went to, you usually couldn’t really see or necessarily even hear what was going on in another patrol’s area, even though they were technically all part of the same site.

              But at one state park we camped at a few times, we could pretty much see and hear everything that was going on in the adjacent group sites.

    • CharlesDarwin@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      I think anyone butthurt about having girls in Scouts has a very tiny penis. I don’t have an explanation for the women obsessed with this kind of thing, though.

      If you are not a kid in Scouts or you are not a parent involved in Scouts, this affects you how? The right is obsessed with all sorts of shit that does not affect them in the least. They’ll take up this kind of cause, all while they cannot afford to get by in this economy. It’s so fucking stupid.

      • andros_rex@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        the women obsessed with this kind of thing

        Right wing women redirect their frustrations with being treated like breeding sows to an acceptable target. Gives them a feeling of power and control.

      • prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        15 hours ago

        The right is obsessed with all sorts of shit that does not affect them in the least

        And yet, on the other hand, they’re incapable of caring about other things until it affects them directly.