• Wispy2891@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    18 hours ago

    From the headline I assumed it was some weird bug, instead it’s enshittification of an open source project. Suddenly they chose to hold ransom of the free users data, so they have to contact sales to know how many thousands of dollars you need to pay every year to access those old messages. It’s self hosted, this limitation doesn’t make sense, it’s pure extortion

  • duncan_bayne@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Mattermost user here, I self-host an instance for friends and family (and their children).

    To upgrade and discover I’d lost access to the message history on my own instance was infuriating. I’m investigating alternatives right now.

    So far Zulip seems reasonable - although Google and especially Apple being shits about push notifications means you can’t self-host push notification servers 🙄 So I’m considering forgoing push notifications altogether and leaning on email notifications instead.

    • walden@wetshav.ing
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Depending on the group using it, you can apply for a Community plan to enable mobile push notifications. I do wish Zulip would use UnifiedPush or something like that, or even allow your own ntfy setup, but I’m placated by the Community plan.

    • wltr@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Have you explored what it takes to self-host a notification server? I explored Zulip, and it looks similar, but I haven’t explored the notification server yet.

      • walden@wetshav.ing
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Zulip paywalls mobile notifications, but you can apply for a Community subscription which is free, and includes mobile notifications.

    • BlameTheAntifa@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Mostly. Official releases are licensed MIT only as compiled software. Derivatives are explicitly required to be AGPL 3.0 but they muddy that with trademark terms that give them a lot of ways to excuse crushing genuinely AGPL 3.0 forks. It’s a minefield and it’s designed that way on purpose. In reality, it’s more “source available” than “open source.”

  • Ech@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    1 day ago

    That’s what? A few megabytes of storage? That’s an absurd restriction.

    • wltr@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      1 day ago

      Do you know of a better alternative? No irony here, I’m looking for something similar for family and company (50 to 100 people) setting. Was thinking of deploying Mattermost. For family, we settled on Matrix and it mostly works. We are at their default server, and I’m considering self-hosting it in the future. Yet, I’m not sure it’s a good idea to have Matrix deployed for a company. It lacks too many features, including search. Mattermost looked like the best option for me. I did try it locally a couple of months back, and mostly liked it.

      However, I never liked them as a company. They have been giving me those ‘we’d give you the community this wonderful opportunity to develop the software for us, for free’ vibes. Now, it feels like my impression correct.

        • simonlm@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          1 day ago

          I just looked at this as I’m looking for a self hosted version, and Zulip has the same 10000 message history limit as the OP.

        • wltr@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          I did, while it mostly okay, I don’t like the mobile notifications limit. Even for a family, ten people is quite small, as inviting a couple of friends would reach the limit.

          With all the chat options, I’m looking for a self-hosted fully controlled version. So for me, that’s a bit weird that a self-hosted version is crippled in any way. If Zulip allows me to self-host the mobile notification thingy, then I think it’s a good alternative. I haven’t explored that yet.

      • dan@upvote.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        23 hours ago

        I know of at least one big tech company that uses a self-hosted, self-contained Mattermost instance, hosted with a major cloud provider totally separate from all their infra, for communication in major outages when all their internal tools are down.

        • Boomer Humor Doomergod@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          They’re not connected to the Internet at all in a lot of cases.

          Plus these large organizations want to be able to read the chats in the DB for compliance and legal reasons.

    • twelvety@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 day ago

      Yep, and very actively developed too.

      Whilst I disagree with some of their technical decisions, it’s really good at what it does.

      This report is sad to read, and concerning that Mattermost are not communicating back to the community.

    • lambalicious
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      There’s IRC, XMPP, and nu-messaging with enshittification.

    • gole@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      I have the same thought. Group chat is a solved problem, why do people keep flocking to shittier alternatives is beyond me. Want notifications? Install a bouncer, done.

    • walden@wetshav.ing
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 hours ago

      IRC is too difficult for normal people to figure out. Normals don’t know how to /join, /nick, and all that other stuff. People want a username and password, because that’s a standard thing that everyone knows.

      Even Matrix is too complicated for most people.

      IRC serves a purpose, but judging by the success of Discord there’s obviously something lacking from IRC.

      • rhabarba@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        2 hours ago

        IRC is too difficult for normal people to figure out.

        “Connect to any server you have ever heard of. Enjoy.”

        Even Matrix is too complicated for most people.

        The problem with Matrix is that its encryption technologies are FUBAR. Unencrypted rooms are slightly nicer to use than IRC channels. But then again: why?