This was published on nature.com.
It looks like the whole article was AI generated.Here are responses from pubpeer.
I never thought I’d see professionals just kind of collectively give up on putting effort into things. Maybe by “fexcectorn” and “frymbial” levels are abnormal?
Shit like this just affirms my opinion that people who think “ai” (llms and diffusion models) are useful or produce good outputs are literally incapable or perceiving detail.
They wade through life noticing only vague shapes and blobs of colour, getting the vibe of a text and nothing more.
I have a similar belief in that I think many people’s brains are just really really good at correcting and filling in sensory input, to the degree that they massively overcorrect and perceive (for example) a stick figure drawing as an anatomically perfect illustration of a human.