In response to a question about how AI works with today’s legal system, Altman said one of the problems of not yet having a legal or policy framework for AI is that there’s no legal confidentiality for users’ conversations.
Bet you million bucks though, he still wants you to keep using it for your therapy. He wants you to feed as much data as possible about yourself. That data is worth billions.
The saddest thought I can think of is telling your emotional problems to a high speed calculator
I know, I really don’t understand why people would take advice from a mechanical parrot. You’re better off throwing chicken bones or interpreting the flight patterns of crows.
There’s no confidentiality nor accountability for the generated words.
It’s a fucking toaster. You put words in, press a button you get toast out.
That’s pointing us into one conclusion, people don’t like silence.
AI training can steal whatever copyrighted property it wants. AI is not subject to any laws. It’s AI, fuck you, use it.
I’m trying to make Ollama more accessible so I can replace Chatgpt.
- I installed open-webui but I don’t wanna deal with tls certs so now I gotta figure out a way to use ssh tunnels (I hate Wireguard)
- I gotta figure out how Ollama can keep a model alive to answer me asap while not interrupting videogames
- I want to build tools for open-webui so I can integrate my local AI with Google calendar and Jira, right now it’s my open-api-toolkit project but it’s not ready for me yet.
I realized how much info I’ve been pushing to Chatgpt and it feels like 10000x more that what I’ve exposed to Google or Instagram. I share with Chatgpt all my wildest secret project ideas and I don’t want Chatgpt to have that anymore. I hope deleting my account will actually delete my chats but I know for a fact that that’s a dream.
I’ve been starting to wonder just how much this shit “phones home”. Because, obviously, this technology can be used to increase the capabilities of corporate surveillance.
