Everything about the “official narrative” smells fishy.
no autopsy = no believing anything the americans say.
Absolutely. The only reason they’d refuse to do an autopsy, is because it would confirm with certainty what the doctors already knew, that it was medication-related.
the parents are the ones that refused an autopsy BUT congress has a fund to pay out people who sue the DPRK (the only country they do this for btw) which the parents did sue, so 2 and 2 together make 4.
He was given a task by the feds and got caught
he got botulism and went into a coma. is there that much to it?
Good thread on it here: https://x.com/UsaKfl/status/1887881223873147327
Wish it wasn’t on x the everything app so I could read it
oooh thanks a working twitter reader
xcancel.com is still working too.
its been dodgy for me
A lot of this is really hard to believe:
Back in September, I had dinner at my friend Stephen Webb’s house with his mother, Sharon Webb, who is a deaconess at the Friendship United Methodist Church. She mentioned that communist nations value propaganda slogans and suggested that I take one from the country to display in her church as a trophy. She then continued, knowing that I was desperate to get a car for transportation between home and university every day. She offered me a used car and $10,000 if I succeeded. She also said that if I were detained and unable to return, her church would pay my mother $200,000 as a generous contribution, which I intended to use for my siblings’ college tuition—though this would still be $200,000 short of the total $400,000 needed.
A car and $10k for a sign? Even if you buy that the church encouraged this and had money to burn, that’s a lot for something that amounts to “huh, that’s neat.”
The thing is it sounds completely impossible but then you look into who these organizations are and what they do and you come out thinking you will never doubt the DPRK ever again lol.
The CIA is an evil organization that has done all sorts of wild shit, but that doesn’t mean every weird accusation directed at them is true.
why is the accusation weird?
Why would anyone pay $10k (and a car) for a sign?
What are the odds one of the few people willing to pay $10k for a sign would also just happen to have a kid who has a friend who’s going to the DPRK?
Why would I believe a far-fetched story that (if you watch the video) is carefully rehearsed (along with the answers to follow up questions)?
I have no idea what actually happened here, but this does not remotely pass the sniff test.
A car and $10k for a sign? Even if you buy that the church encouraged this and had money to burn, that’s a lot for something that amounts to “huh, that’s neat.”
I mean, as far as I understand, the story is that’s what he was told, which motivated him to do it given the money he/family needed. Not that he ever got such a payout. Could easily be the church person lied to get him to do it and had never intended to pay out anything.
It’s possible, it just sounds incredibly far fetched. And with the press conference being obviously rehearsed… there’s no reason to believe this story.
I don’t get what’s far-fetched about it. We’re talking about the same country (the US) whose FBI has done stuff like this: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/peteraldhous/fbi-entrapment (Going to great lengths to get someone to commit a crime, so they can arrest them for it)
Obviously that’s not exactly the same thing we’re talking about, since in this case it’d be wanting to get a result to the US’s benefit, not one they’d personally want to arrest the person for, but there’s even an example of offering someone money in that same article, through an informant. We know that the US has done coups and terrorism across the world. We know it’s done absolutely out there stuff like project MKUltra. And this one isn’t even that wild. Why is any of this a stretch?
it’d be wanting to get a result to the US’s benefit
How? A sign from the DPRK has zero value beyond “oh that’s kind of neat.” Coups and terrorism have meaningful end goals, not “look at this weird sign I have.”
I never saw the videos. I think they tell the story rather well.
He dead.
Depends where in the story you want to start
Start where you desire.
He came, he saw and he died.
deleted by creator
They didn’t kill him. In fact they took very good care of him
He looked pretty bad when he got home.
He may have looked bad when he got home, but even top medical examiners have defended the DPRK, and claim the DPRK did everything they could to save Warmbier/nurse him back to health or mitigate his symptoms, even when they didn’t even have to.
Can you please point me to relevant articles? Thanks so much.
He didn’t have bedsores when they examined him in the US which is more that can be said about any comatose patient in the West. The DPRK didn’t invent botulism and it’s not responsible for people unaware of their allergies. If I fall into a coma in my western hospital because I had an allergy that I didn’t know about nobody would blame the doctors for giving me the medication that caused it.
