• @flicker@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      106 days ago

      Back in the day, women needed a man, so you were supposed to focus on catching one instead of on weeding out the overly sensitive ones.

      And it wasn’t that long ago. I knew a grandmother who had gone to college to get her degree in doing housewife stuff, which was a common method for catching a man. Gross stuff.

      • @Waraugh@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        56 days ago

        I mean women couldn’t even have bank accounts until like the 60’s and I’m fairly certain it was in the 70’s before it became commonly done.

        I have to navigate all the way back to my mother in my family tree to find the first women that lived while not being allowed to have a bank account in the US.

  • @Hyphlosion@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    9
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Before realizing what instance this was posted in, I thought “I bet this was taken out of context.”

    Good to know my brain still works. Occasionally.

    Also, now sub’d.

  • ddh
    link
    English
    67 days ago

    Idiot-filter, in wearable form!

    • @Couldbealeotard@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      36 days ago

      Judging by the artwork, this could easily be 60s, which is nearly three quarters of a century ago.

      I don’t think it’s that wild considering how the world worked back then.

  • Nightwatch Admin
    link
    fedilink
    247 days ago

    “If there’s anything I can’t stand, it’s touchy bois! Back to momma, chop chop there’s a good lad.”

  • synae[he/him]
    link
    English
    167 days ago

    You’ll never get that woman out of her pants with that attitude!

  • @some_guy
    link
    57 days ago

    I’ll fuck her for him. I think women in pants are hot.