• fmstrat
      link
      fedilink
      English
      44 months ago

      Can you select your server there? Doesn’t seem like it. Plus this one looks absolutely TINY.

    • @vintageballs@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      Deutsch
      -24 months ago

      How is that tiny though?

      Considering this is about sending some random data to a server and measuring the speed, that’s quite large. I’ve seen whole computer games that fit in 1/10 of that space.

      • @MHanak@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        84 months ago

        It could fit in a standard 3.5 inch floppy disk, sure it’s not the smallest, but for a full app written in javascript and not asm it is, in fact, small

  • Dizzy Devil Ducky
    link
    fedilink
    English
    28
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Aaaaand your ISP has already begun forcibly speeding up your service to make it look better in 3… 2… 1…

    No doubt the second they figure this out a large amount of the scummy ISPs around the world are gonna start temporary reverse speed throttling when this is used, per usual, to make themselves look better.

  • @ExtremeDullard
    link
    264 months ago

    I’m slightly disappointed that this isn’t about open source amphetamine.

  • Emptiness
    link
    fedilink
    18
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Does anyone know of a speed test where you can set it up to run by itself regularly and push a notification to a channel (like pushbullet or similar) when the speed is below a certain threshold?

    Edit: I went with self hosted speedtest-tracker as a docker container and notifications through Discord webhook.

    Thanks for all the tips!! ❤️

    • @takeda@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      184 months ago

      If I had this requirement I would just generate a file of specific size, place it on one server and on the other I would have a shell script running via cron and measure the time it took to download the file.

      It seems like a relatively simple problem.

      BTW are you sure you want to test download speed and not latency? I think some routers might have the later built in.

      • Emptiness
        link
        fedilink
        24 months ago

        Definitely speed. My ISP runs on another service providers hardware and it bugs out from time to time and I get 1/10th of the speeds I usually have. My ISP has no way of knowing this so I have to know when it happens and place a ticket so they can place a ticket on the hardware guys.

      • Norah - She/They
        link
        fedilink
        English
        24 months ago

        It really depends. Once every 1-5 minutes, sure, maybe. Once every 1-5 hours tho? You’re likely fine.

        • @MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          3
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          True, although once per hour would still be a lot of data.

          For example me running a fast.com test uses about 1.5GB of data to run a single test, so around 1TB per month if ran hourly.

          • Norah - She/They
            link
            fedilink
            English
            14 months ago

            Once every 6hrs would only be 180GB. A script that does it every six hours, but then increases the frequency if it goes below a certain threshold, could work well. I guess it all depends on how accurate you need the data to be.

    • @9point6@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      44 months ago

      Funnily enough, I had something exactly like this set up with home assistant. You can add Ookla and fast.com speed tests as devices, which will run the tests periodically, and then I had an automation set up to send me a message via telegram whenever speed was less than half of what it was supposed to be

    • @667@lemmy.radio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      If you’re on MacOS, you can run networkquality via crontab and append the results to a text file. I did this for a few months on a congested network to identify ideal times to try and do schoolwork.

      E: A word.

  • @twei@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    34 months ago

    Does anyone know about a speedtest that’s like iperf but multicore and suited for >100GbE? I’ve seen Patrick from STH use something that could do like 400GbE but I haven’t found out what it’s called

  • @ObsidianZed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    24 months ago

    At my last job, we used iperf a lot for internal speed tests and we used to wonder if there were public iperf servers to test against.

    I’m not sure how secure that’d be or if that would even be worth it, but it was an interesting thought.

  • ᗪᗩᗰᑎ
    link
    fedilink
    24 months ago

    Cool project! I used OpenSpeedTest last week to test local intranet speeds.

    If you already have docker/podman installed, the command below should get you going quickly:

     docker run --restart=unless-stopped --name openspeedtest -d -p 3000:3000 -p 3001:3001 openspeedtest/latest
    
      • @pop@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        174 months ago

        Also the ISP probably knows most of the servers speedtest owns and accelerate speeds for them along with other popular speed test websites, while throttling other regular connections.

          • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]
            link
            fedilink
            English
            4
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            As somebody who once worked at an ISP: they absolutely do that, and it isn’t illegal. In fact, ISP’s host many of Ookla’s speedtest servers. The less infrastructure your test needs to go through, the better the results will be—there’s nothing faster than a network that’s communicating with itself.