And apparently they are awesome. Metro Goldwyn Mayer - again - did some great filming.

When I initially watched the hobbit parts, I was mad about not respecting the books. They kinda did, I know realize. In HD, and in native language these movies are a piece of art.

I had a very strong opinion about how bad they were - but I reconsidered. Even the lead actor Bilbo I opposed - He did a remarkable act. Anyhow. American influence hits hard, once it does. Started at some safari show with a lion named Clarence. Don’t know the name but I loved it - as fair as I can remember.

Love all, but Some.

help-circle
  • @imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    282 months ago

    Martin Freeman was tremendous as Bilbo. And if you don’t compare to LOTR it’s a very good adaptation.

    But there are two main criticisms that I agree with.

    • it was too long and they added too many subplots that didn’t exist in the book

    • it used too much CGI and not enough practical effects

    As a LOTR nerd it doesn’t bother me too much because I’m happy to get more content. But as a film, I think it could have been executed better. There was never enough book to fill 3 whole movies.

    • The Snark Urge
      link
      fedilink
      English
      102 months ago

      Try to track down a copy of the “Tolkien edit”. It’s a fan made recut that clears up a lot of the same grievances I had with it

      • RBG
        link
        fedilink
        English
        52 months ago

        Oh boy, fan edits! I think I only watched the M4 edit, might have gotten the name wrong. Was pretty good and only one or twonthings are a bit weird because of cuts.

        • @ApollosArrow@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          This is the one I watched and enjoyed it. It’s really crazy how much was added. The only glaring thing for me was Thorin’s teleporting sword, and only a fan watching would really notice.

        • The Snark Urge
          link
          fedilink
          English
          22 months ago

          I know, wouldn’t usually mention one but TE was reasonably clean for what it set out to achieve.

    • @Minarble@aussie.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      32 months ago

      I just bought the extended editions…

      Gimmee more time in MiddleEarth!

      I just wish the Dwarven song in Bilbo’s hobbit house went on for more than 2 verses.

    • @mryessirOP
      link
      English
      32 months ago

      Regarding subplots I think they managed to get a nice rhythm of different scenes. Inwould argue that the book specifically targeted the story of Bilbo where as the film tries to bundle some more story to the available characters. The CGI didn’t bother me negatively. It was done pretty well! Though no CGI would have been best, jepp.

  • @Bassman1805@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    132 months ago

    I think when they were released, everybody brought the expectations they had from tLotR, which kinda doomed it from the start. That was lightning in a bottle, you can do EVERYTHING right and not get that same kind of success.

    The Hobbit Trilogy is good when you remove those expectations.

    • Rhaedas
      link
      fedilink
      92 months ago

      It’s partially why Jackson didn’t want to try to repeat, it was a unique experience. Credit as well to New Line Cinema for taking the risks of LotR that no other studio wanted to touch. And Jackson did the best he could to save the dropped Hobbit project, I’d rather have the combo of excellent scenes and messes of a plot than nothing.

    • @mryessirOP
      link
      English
      1
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Admittedly I watched cam rips with bad sound and formed a premature opinion. And I loudly declared that the imdb rating was off. I’m sorry about my actions.

      // edit: they may even be able to conquest the throne of tLotR. They are thought through very much.

  • @halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    112 months ago

    If they’d just stuck to the book, not shoehorning in subplots and characters for fan service, like Legolas, and made at most 2 films it would have been great. The pacing just isn’t there for 3 films, and it’s clearly obvious.

    The Hobbit is shorter than any of the LoTR novels, and the studio demand for a trilogy is the biggest core issue. The base that nearly every issue comes back to.

  • ekZepp
    link
    fedilink
    English
    8
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    I’ve find a fan-made edited version online who cut away the whole elf-romance arc and it feels way better to watch.

  • @radicalautonomy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    32 months ago

    I saw the first Hobbit film in the theater in 3D and 48 frames per second. That was a fucking trip…felt like I was watching a 3D soap opera somehow.

    • @mryessirOP
      link
      English
      12 months ago

      Follow up with the second in a 3D home theatre and get high beforehand!!

  • slazer2au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    22 months ago

    The first film and a half is rather good. It starts going downhill at the river barrel scene.

    Then there was the dragon fight in the third one, oh dear was that terrible.

    The whole Gandalf knocking off for a bit is cannon though, so I am fine. It kinda explains why the eye returned to Mordor after so long time.