• Diplomjodler
    link
    fedilink
    645 days ago

    But that book is the only thing that keeps them from going on murderous rampages. Coming to think of it, it’s not even very good at stopping the murderous rampages.

    • JackGreenEarth
      link
      fedilink
      English
      185 days ago

      The Crusades, the Inquisition, the war in the middle east - all Abrahamic-religiously motivated murderous activities.

      • @macrocephalic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        95 days ago

        Israel - Palestine is two non-Christian abrahamic religions fighting each other currently. Then of course there’s Catholics and Protestants, and all the different Muslim - Christian conflicts.

    • nocturne
      link
      fedilink
      145 days ago

      It certainly does not stop them from raping. However reading the Bible, it seems it actually encourages both murder and rape.

      • @cmbabul@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        65 days ago

        Depends on the eyes reading it, I read the Bible like several times and all it did was make me not believe in it less each time

      • @ruse8145
        link
        14 days ago

        Only of furiners. Red blooded <your in-group here>s are safe.

  • @fl42v@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    525 days ago

    How about Numbers 31:17-18 where Moses says:

    Now therefore kill every male among the little ones, and kill every woman that hath known man by lying with him.

    But all the women children, that have not known a man by lying with him, keep alive for yourselves.

    • JackGreenEarth
      link
      fedilink
      English
      275 days ago

      Definitely not as sex slaves, as a certain religious person I know argues, as apparently that would be intermarriage and forbidden! They just have to live with the trauma of having their entire family brutally murdered before them, and then being enslaved to the murderers for the rest of their lives. So much better!

      • @ruse8145
        link
        54 days ago

        How would you have morals without religion

        As an example of what not to do

  • mechoman444
    link
    fedilink
    114 days ago

    No no you don’t understand. You shouldn’t be taking it literally it’s an allegory - many theists probably

  • @groucho
    link
    English
    155 days ago

    If you read it the right way, the book of Jonah reads like a really weird episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm.

      • FuglyDuck
        link
        fedilink
        English
        45 days ago

        A narcissistic asshole gaslighting its victims into believing they’re not really victims because the narcissistic asshole made a bet.

        It’s supposed the be an explanation for how evil can exist despite a benevolent creator… but it sums up as a sock puppet to which the explanation is “you wouldn’t understand”

        • Flying SquidOP
          link
          fedilink
          45 days ago

          It’s also completely undermined in Isaiah.

          I form the light, and create darkness: I make peace, and create evil: I the LORD do all these things.

          Isaiah 45:7. Evil exists because God creates evil.

          • FuglyDuck
            link
            fedilink
            English
            2
            edit-2
            5 days ago

            pretty sure Isaiah didn’t conceive of a benevolent god.

            pretty sure Isaiah’s god (all four isaiahs, in fact,) was a pretty freaking angry god.

      • @groucho
        link
        English
        25 days ago

        Pretty much yeah. I was going to say an episode of Fear Factor but same thing.

        • Flying SquidOP
          link
          fedilink
          34 days ago

          Now, the text doesn’t say “God appointed a whale” but just “a great fish.” Both the original Hebrew dag gadol and the Greek of the Septuagint, kētei megalōi, translate as “huge fish.” Archaeology has proved that the Mediterranean was once home to a great variety of whales —which the Romans hunted almost to the point of extinction. It might be the case that the author of the biblical text simply wanted to contrast Jonah’s “closed mouth” to that of the “big fish,” able not only to swallow a whole human being but also being hollow enough as to provide him with safe shelter for three days and three nights. Interestingly enough, during those three days Jonah certainly keeps his mouth open — he seems to spend them praying out loud.

          But how did this “big fish” turn into a whale and not into one of the 47 species of sharks found in the Mediterranean? It seems St. Jerome is to blame.

          https://aleteia.org/2021/07/15/jonah-was-not-swallowed-by-a-whale

          • Angel Mountain
            link
            fedilink
            24 days ago

            Does it really matter whether it was a whale or a “fish”? You can’t live in either, so it’s a BS story in a book of fairytales people take way too seriously.