SDF Chatter
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
mox to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前

FCC explicitly prohibits fast lanes, closing possible net neutrality loophole

arstechnica.com

external-link
message-square
110
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@lemmy.zip
1.07K
external-link

FCC explicitly prohibits fast lanes, closing possible net neutrality loophole

arstechnica.com

mox to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前
message-square
110
link
fedilink
  • cross-posted to:
  • technology@lemmy.zip
Putting applications into fast lanes would violate FCC's no-throttling rule.
  • xenspidey@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    55
    ·
    2 年前

    The things NN is trying to “solve” was never an issue either

    • Kraiden@kbin.run
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      Net neutrality is the status quo, it’s not trying to “solve” anything

      • xenspidey@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        2 年前

        If it was the status quo then why have rules?

        • Kraiden@kbin.run
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          2 年前

          To. Protect. It.

          You really have no idea what you’re talking about, do you?

        • GeneralVincent@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 年前

          Because companies like to make money by breaking the status quo when there aren’t any rules.

          It’s the thing they like to do most honestly, and why we need to make rules when we see open loopholes

        • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          2 年前

          deleted by creator

        • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 年前

          Jfjcjejusjx

    • ShepherdPie@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 年前

      Then it shouldn’t be an issue to implement it then right?

      • xenspidey@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        18
        ·
        2 年前

        But there’s never been an issue… Should Netflix pay more for their increased traffic… Yes, it’s not equal to my browsing.

        • Tar_Alcaran@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          2 年前

          This is totally missing the point. What happened is the equivalent of the bus company calling the supermarket and saying “hey, I’ve noticed a lot of people going to your store. If you want to keep that, you’ve got to pay extra so I don’t drop half the busses from your route”

          • BolexForSoup@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            2 年前

            ifucueuei

        • BirdyBoogleBop@lemmy.dbzer0.comdeleted by creator
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          2 年前

          They do.

          Do you think Netflix connects to the internet for free?

    • AstralPath@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      2 年前

      I’m enjoying watching you dig this massive pit for yourself. Lol

Technology@lemmy.world

technology@lemmy.world

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !technology@lemmy.world

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


  • @L4s@lemmy.world
  • @autotldr@lemmings.world
  • @PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks
  • @wikibot@lemmy.world
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 3.39K users / day
  • 9.14K users / week
  • 15.4K users / month
  • 22.4K users / 6 months
  • 628 local subscribers
  • 86.9K subscribers
  • 18.5K Posts
  • 782K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • L3s@lemmy.world
  • enu@lemmy.world
  • Technopagan@lemmy.world
  • L4sBot@lemmy.worldB
  • L3s@hackingne.ws
  • BE: 0.19.20
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org