mox to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前FCC explicitly prohibits fast lanes, closing possible net neutrality loopholearstechnica.comexternal-linkmessage-square110linkfedilinkarrow-up11.07Karrow-down13cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zip
arrow-up11.07Karrow-down1external-linkFCC explicitly prohibits fast lanes, closing possible net neutrality loopholearstechnica.commox to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 年前message-square110linkfedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.zip
minus-squarexenspidey@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down23·2 年前If it was the status quo then why have rules?
minus-squareKraiden@kbin.runlinkfedilinkarrow-up19·2 年前To. Protect. It. You really have no idea what you’re talking about, do you?
minus-squareGeneralVincent@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·2 年前Because companies like to make money by breaking the status quo when there aren’t any rules. It’s the thing they like to do most honestly, and why we need to make rules when we see open loopholes
If it was the status quo then why have rules?
To. Protect. It.
You really have no idea what you’re talking about, do you?
Because companies like to make money by breaking the status quo when there aren’t any rules.
It’s the thing they like to do most honestly, and why we need to make rules when we see open loopholes
deleted by creator
Jfjcjejusjx