SDF Chatter
  • Communities
  • Create Post
  • Create Community
  • heart
    Support Lemmy
  • search
    Search
  • Login
  • Sign Up
canihasaccount@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year ago

Peer review can be fun

lemmy.world

message-square
20
link
fedilink
374

Peer review can be fun

lemmy.world

canihasaccount@lemmy.world to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year ago
message-square
20
link
fedilink
alert-triangle
You must log in or register to comment.
  • DaddleDew@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Could it be some sort of meta joke where the reviewer is mocking how the paper is written by imitating its bad writing style?

    • Sphks@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      59
      ·
      1 year ago

      I bet it’s a form with multiple entries, each entry is not different enough of the other ones:

      How is the subject of this paper ?
      What about the style ?
      You checked to reject it, why should it be rejected ?
      What’s the overall comment ?

      Then it’s all concatenated into one blob of review.

  • Xantar@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    93
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Not to mention it is poorly written.

    • Onno (VK6FLAB)@lemmy.radio
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      ·
      1 year ago

      … not forgetting that it’s poorly laid out.

      • Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        …and let’s not forget also poorly written

  • nxdefiant@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    48
    ·
    1 year ago

    Wrongly motivated?

    • anarchrist@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      1 year ago

      Lads doing science to get laid, I think.

      • thefartographer@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        20
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’re certainly not in it for the money

        • shneancy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          perhaps they mean world domination?

  • 👍Maximum Derek👍@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    ·
    1 year ago

    It’s like they were trying to do a compliment sandwich but the best compliment they come up with is “poorly written.”

    • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      1 year ago

      Bun: it’s poorly written

      Middle: you are bad at this

      Bun: it’s poorly written and poorly motivated and wrong

    • synae[he/him]
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’ll take what I can get

  • iAvicenna@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    35
    ·
    1 year ago

    As a large language model, I find this paper to be poorly written.

  • Rolando@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Funny thing: it took me a while to figure out why this was noteworthy. I think that my brain must have a pre-processor for reading language written by someone for whom English is a second language, which automatically kicked in.

    For better or for worse, these days the writer of this review would just put it through a GPT before sending it.

    • kender242@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Could it be sarcastic that the review is also poorly written?

      Reads like GPT, but maybe the redundant messages mirror the paper. Wonder if there is more context or it’s just a meme…

      … Follow shitmyrevieweressay XD

    • SavedKriss@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It looks likee the writer of the response already put it through GPT. GPT 2 to be precise. :D

    • Trafficone@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      The dang old ESL filter makes it impossible to recognize bad English out in public. My wife got a shit that reads “force of the nature” and neither of our brains perceived the “the”

      • Flummoxed@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        1 year ago

        You get odd phrases on your shit?? 😁

  • moosetwin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    rimworld book descriptions

  • boardgamesareawesome@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I thought this was a review for a bible.

  • Ragdoll X@lemmy.worldBanned
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 year ago

    deleted by creator

Science Memes@mander.xyz

science_memes@mander.xyz

Subscribe from Remote Instance

Create a post
You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !science_memes@mander.xyz

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don’t throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

  • !spiders@lemmy.world

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

  • !academia@mander.xyz
  • !science@mander.xyz
  • !scicomm@mander.xyz

Biology and Life Sciences

  • !abiogenesis@mander.xyz
  • !animal-behavior@mander.xyz
  • !anthropology@mander.xyz
  • !arachnology@mander.xyz
  • !balconygardening@slrpnk.net
  • !biodiversity@mander.xyz
  • !biology@mander.xyz
  • !biophysics@mander.xyz
  • !botany@mander.xyz
  • !ecology@mander.xyz
  • !entomology@mander.xyz
  • !fermentation@mander.xyz
  • !herpetology@mander.xyz
  • !houseplants@mander.xyz
  • !medicine@mander.xyz
  • !microscopy@mander.xyz
  • !mycology@mander.xyz
  • !nudibranchs@mander.xyz
  • !nutrition@mander.xyz
  • !palaeoecology@mander.xyz
  • !palaeontology@mander.xyz
  • !photosynthesis@mander.xyz
  • !plantid@mander.xyz
  • !plants@mander.xyz
  • !reptiles and amphibians@mander.xyz

Physical Sciences

  • !astronomy@mander.xyz
  • !chemistry@mander.xyz
  • !earthscience@mander.xyz
  • !geography@mander.xyz
  • !geospatial@mander.xyz
  • !nuclear@mander.xyz
  • !physics@mander.xyz
  • !quantum-computing@mander.xyz
  • !spectroscopy@mander.xyz

Humanities and Social Sciences

  • !archaeology@mander.xyz
  • !folklore@mander.xyz
  • !history@mander.xyz
  • !old_maps@mander.xyz

Practical and Applied Sciences

  • !exercise-and sports-science@mander.xyz
  • !gardening@mander.xyz
  • !self sufficiency@mander.xyz
  • !soilscience@slrpnk.net
  • !terrariums@mander.xyz
  • !timelapse@mander.xyz

Memes

  • !bushrat_confidential@slrpnk.net
  • !science_memes@mander.xyz

Miscellaneous

  • !answered@mander.xyz
  • !mander@mander.xyz
Visibility: Public
globe

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

  • 1.05K users / day
  • 6.69K users / week
  • 11.4K users / month
  • 23.9K users / 6 months
  • 156 local subscribers
  • 15.6K subscribers
  • 4.96K Posts
  • 127K Comments
  • Modlog
  • mods:
  • Salamander@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@mander.xyz
  • SciBot@mander.xyz
  • fossilesque@lemmy.dbzer0.com
  • BE: 0.19.11
  • Modlog
  • Instances
  • Docs
  • Code
  • join-lemmy.org