A union that’s organizing Waffle Houseworkers filed a petition with the Labor Department on Monday, asking federal officials to investigate the iconic chain’s policy of deducting mandatory meal costs from workers’ paychecks.

Waffle House takes at least $3 for each on-shift meal out of workers’ pay, whether they end up eating it or not, according to the petition from the Union of Southern Service Workers. The USSW called it “especially alarming” since many workers are paid a tipped sub-minimum wage “as low as $2.90 per hour,” not including gratuities.

  • iAmTheTot
    link
    fedilink
    2416 months ago

    Wage theft in the United States exceeds all theft, burglary, larceny, etc values put together.

    • @xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      956 months ago

      It’s important to keep this in mind whenever retailers decry shoplifters as a source of price increases - the retailers steal more from their employees paychecks than what is stolen from them (and most shrinkage isn’t due to theft anyways).

      It’s also important to keep this in mind whenever asshats like Bezos or Musk talk about eliminating the NLRB.

      • KingJalopy
        link
        fedilink
        436 months ago

        What shoplifters? I’ve never seen anyone steal anything. And neither have any of you…

        • @some_guy
          link
          46 months ago

          Depends on the theft. I won’t rat out someone stealing food or baby formula. But I would for sure rat out those group-assaults on premium brands. They smash and break shit unnecessarily and leave chaos for the workers when they’re gone.

  • @PunnyName@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    586 months ago

    We need a critical mass boycott that has actual change. Lots are prepping to boycott all Kellogg’s products starting April 1 (giving time to prep, but not bulk buy) for 3 months.

    Hopefully this kinda shit actually starts to make a real dent. Causing actual crash, or actual positive change.

    • @ghostrider2112@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      346 months ago

      Every person that votes against companies with their wallets makes a dent. I think the economy is helping by making more people HAVE to start making some tough spending decisions. Companies are pretty stupid to not be considering that as they continue to try to fuck people over more each day.

      • @SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        36 months ago

        I’m not entirely convinced. The bud light bullshit was MASSIVE and their stock only took a tiny hit, and that was a right wing thing which means the participation percentage was massive.

        • @Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          76 months ago

          How was the bud light thing massive? People were buying Bud just to pour it out and then just buying other products in Inbev’s portfolio. People don’t understand that 85% of the beer in most liquor stores is a split between Coors and Inbev portfolios.

        • @ghostrider2112@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          76 months ago

          I’ve found most people are more talk than action. I am almost to the point of having to create my own supply chain as my boycott list continues to grow over the years lol

          • @SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            46 months ago

            Ethical consumption is basically impossible, you gotta draw what lines you can.

            Though I do need to refresh my memory of what nestle owns, because fuck them in particular.

              • @SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                46 months ago

                Fuck me they own Purina, which is fantastic pet food. And stouffer’s, which is terrible but delicious and fast human food.

                Welp, I’ll forego the frozens but my cats are more important than my morals.

                • @ghostrider2112@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  26 months ago

                  I agree on Stouffer’s, but I knew about that one as I live in the same region as the original US factory for them. However, I stick with whatever knock-off brand looks best these days. Yes, being intimately familiar with the finickiness of cats, that is the only option.

  • @ghostrider2112@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    336 months ago

    That’s pretty fucked up. I would add them to the list of companies that I will no longer patronize, but they there were already there for being gross in other ways.

    • @xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      386 months ago

      You’d think so… but our two tier justice system just let Trump cut his bail requirement in a third because “it so hawwwd”. Never underestimate how stuffed with corporate toadies our justice system is.

      • BarqsHasBite
        link
        fedilink
        106 months ago

        There’s a right wing seminar of economics that they invite and “educate” supreme Court justices on how economics works. Well their ideology of economics anyway. Don’t recall if it was a one time thing back then or ongoing but holy cow.

        • @xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          126 months ago

          You don’t even need something so explicit - justices regularly rub elbows with billionaires and are pretty clearly influenced by the association.

          We need something like Discworld’s unseen university where they can just be academics locked away from public discourse and celebrity - being a Supreme Court Justice should be an obscure dead-end of a job that only appeals to the legally obsessed.

          • BarqsHasBite
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            6 months ago

            Yup that’s where I learned about this. Thanks for the link.

      • @beetus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        46 months ago

        Btw he still has to play the full amount. Just reduced payment needed now. It’s still shitty, but he ain’t off the hook.

  • @watty@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    66 months ago

    I found this a bit confusing, but I think the core of this is really that Waffle House staff don’t get a choice on whether or not they buy a meal during their shift. Is that right?

    I kind of got that gist from the article, but nothing super clear. It said that employees pay for the meal whether they eat it or not, which if you ordered food and didn’t eat it, that’s kinda on you. I think it should be saying that they are charged for the meal whether they ordered it or not, if that’s what is happening.

    • @scoobford@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      15
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      Basically, yes. They’re forcing you to purchase food, whether you want it, intend to consume it, or get to consume it.

      And FWIW in the restaurant industry meal breaks are usually not a thing, so it is very common to order food and just have to scarf it down whenever you’re not using your hands or in front of guests. I used to unwrap, consume, and dispose of the packaging for a sandwich in the time it took me to walk from the door to dry storage.

      Edit: also IIRC wage deductions are usually illegal unless for uniforms or ordered by a court. This is probably an easy case.

      • Ms. ArmoredThirteen
        link
        fedilink
        56 months ago

        If you’re not eating hour old food above a trash can after mistiming making a meal what even are you doing (I don’t cook professionally, was married to a chef/baker and got to hear all about the nonsense)