That mom-and-pop Seattle operation just can’t catch a break.

  • Deedasmi
    link
    fedilink
    English
    451 year ago

    Read the article folks. Amazon is claiming they don’t meet the definition in Europe, where there are other online retailers with more sales in those countries that are not flagged as ‘Very Large Online Platforms’. Amazon is simply claiming that them getting that designation and other online retailers of the same or larger sizes are not is unfair and Amazon shouldn’t receive that tag in those countries.

    • Pete HahnloserOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      661 year ago

      Amazon’s argument seems to boil down to “we sell products, not ads, so the law shouldn’t apply to us.” The EC response seems to be “what you would like the law to say is not what it says.”

      Regardless, the fact that Amazon doesn’t like the law means it was written to protect consumers from corporations. In the states, we’ve completely forgotten that government is supposed to do precisely that.

        • @coldredlight@beehaw.orgM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          51 year ago

          I don’t remember the numbers but their ads division has been showing massive growth over the past several years, they make billions selling ads these days.

      • In the US, the Government does not represent the people, but those who buy elections. The people who buy elections have no incentive to change anything, and nothing will change in absence of a violent communist revoution

    • @wizzor@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      221 year ago

      That is what they are saying which is pretty disingenuous. The entire point of the law is to target multinationals which cannot be reined in by national legislation.

      Boo hoo, the poor tiny Amazon doesn’t want to take responsibility.

      • @AndrewZabar@beehaw.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        61 year ago

        Yeah seriously there’s literally nothing to defend them about anything. Even doing so with something technically accurate is just plain blind.

    • snowe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      211 year ago

      They claimed that other _retailers _ don’t meet the definition, not other online retailers. It’s like saying eBay should be exempt from the law because ford sells more cars than them. It doesn’t really matter how many sales you have, it matters how many online people you serve. I seriously doubt the other retailers have anything close to 45 million monthly active users.

    • @delial
      link
      English
      71 year ago

      Did the EU even define the term “Very Large Online Platforms”? I think this is the bill, but it doesn’t ever define the term. Amazon may be right, purely because the legislators are incompetent idiots.

        • @delial
          link
          171 year ago

          Thank you! Here’s the actual PDF doc of their clarifications and here’s the original DSA

          The specific language for number of users is:

          average monthly active recipients of their service in the Union, calculated as an average over the period of the past six months

          And the definition of active recipient:

          (p) ‘active recipient of an online platform’ means a recipient of the service that has engaged with an online platform by either requesting the online platform to host information or being exposed to information hosted by the online platform and disseminated through its online interface;

          So you just need 45 million EU citizens looking at a platform to qualify as a VLOP. Amazon probably qualifies, but it would be easy for them to prove they were unfairly discriminated against as well.