I seriously cannot have any degree of nuanced conversation here.

Like I get it, we all know capitalism is bad, but it feels like every time I or anyone go towards discussing the steps that need to be taken to address current looming problems in the short term, someone has to jump in and shut it down with "capitalism bad >:[ " and tear down any idea presented because its not complete and total destruction of the current economic model.

The result just feels like an echo chamber where no actual solutions get presented other than someone posting whole ass dissertations on their 33-step (where 30/33 steps are about as vague as “we’ll just handle it”) plan to fully convert the world to an anarchist commune.

Edit: I still vastly prefer Lemmy and the fediverse and a whole, my complaint here is that many of you are TOO INTENSE. You blow up small scale discussion.

    • @KnightontheSun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      645 months ago

      Agree. Reddit was the same thing if not worse. Nuance is [apparently] dead and if you do not explain everything from the dawn of Man to cover your thought, people pick the comment apart like carrion as if you’ve never thought about anything deeply before. They might even gloss over things you did say and attempt to invalidate or discredit your post because only they hold the Truth of the Internet handed down from the Elders. It can be a bit frustrating.

      • Deceptichum
        link
        fedilink
        29
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Did you even consider vegans don’t eat decaying flesh? You cant just hold everyone to your standards. I’m not even going to bother reading the rest of what you wrote because you’re so fundamentally wrong already that I’m confident i can stop there and not miss anything of substance.

    • @bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      105 months ago

      IMO, it’s anywhere that has a voting system in place. Every forum has a hivemind, but the hivemind is especially reinforced when fake Internet points are at stake. That, and moderators yanking comments they don’t agree with.

      • Deceptichum
        link
        fedilink
        11
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Its not about the points, its about the weighted value.

        Higher point posts go up higher snd are seen by more people. Lowering posts makes them less prominent.

        You can go for a system of whoever posts first gets their comment to be first, leading to people rushing low quality crap to be at the top. Or most recent comment first, giving you a shit experience like browsing a discord for information. Or random post order, where high quality content gets buried under a sea of shit.

        Ranked voting is the best option we’ve found that works online so far.

        Personally I downvote shit all the time if i feel its not more worthy than other content. Everyone should be judging posts according to their own metric so we can average out content across a communities views.

        • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
          link
          fedilink
          65 months ago

          The system was a lot more useful when it showed up votes and downvotes separately. I was stoked when Lemmy came out and that was the default display. Now they seem to have removed that even as a user config option, which is very disappointing. People perceive something with 20 downvotes very differently than they do something with 380 upvotes and 400 downvotes. Showing an average skews people’s perception and helps create a hive mind response approach. People don’t want to reply if their reply might be controversial, because it looks like they’re just being shouted down. And then people who agree don’t want to respond and say they agree, or they’re just jumping into the fire with the first person.

          • @na_th_an@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            75 months ago

            I still see separate counts in the web UI. And I agree that separate counts are essential information. I think the level of discourse on Reddit dropped significantly when they hid the separate up/down counts.

            • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
              link
              fedilink
              45 months ago

              I think the config option is set per instance. Some of them have it, some of them don’t. And then a lot of the popular apps don’t support it, even if your instance has it.

                • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet
                  link
                  fedilink
                  15 months ago

                  I checked the website too, and it was combined. I checked again just now and it’s not combined. Weird! I have instance hopped a few times, so it must have been whatever instance I was on at the time.

                  • @nutomic@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    25 months ago

                    Ah I believe lemmy-ui only shows seperate counts if the post actually received any downvotes.

        • @bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          45 months ago

          I 100% agree that this is how it should work, and it doe work in more objective communities, particularly tech-oriented ones such as troubleshooting. The issue lies in subjective conversations, where people are debating their opinions, especially politics.

          If the vote counts were hidden, it likely wouldn’t be an issue. But in practice, it turns conversations into an opinion popularity contest if the topic is of a more subjective nature (I’m right, you’re wrong, yada yada).

          The other important metric to this is that a significant number of people simply lurk with no interaction whatsoever. While participation is key to determine a proper weighting of content quality, it’s not like there’s a mechanism for forcing participation. And if there was, a good number of people probably wouldn’t even bother if there were such a requirement. Ultimately with link aggregators and microblogging, people just want to consume content (including comments) while keeping to themselves.

        • @bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          85 months ago

          Both the web interface and various apps still have the functionality in place (though I think the individual user can disable it). I think that since a lot of Lemmy users are reddit refugees, the mentality carried over unfortunately. That said, hiveminds and echo chambers are kind of human nature, so it’s pretty hard to escape; ultimately it’s on the individual to either fall in line or ignore it.

            • @bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              15 months ago

              Ah maybe not total but separated, still though, simple math. I’m on Voyager more than my desktop so I don’t really see the web UI very often.

              • @can@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                1
                edit-2
                5 months ago

                simple math

                Go ahead and try to add up my my comment karma lol.

                ETA: if your app shows an aggregate this is because it wasn’t removed from the API. This is an oversight as noted on the github.

          • @nutomic@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            25 months ago

            Karma is removed in 0.19, curious where you still see it. Anyway its impossible to calculate correctly for remote users, because there is no guarantee that the local instance has fetched all posts from that user, and all votes on those posts.

          • @can@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            2
            edit-2
            5 months ago

            It was removed from the web ui but was still left in the API.

            dessalines:

            Public karma counts and karma farming are one of the things we really don’t want to replicate from reddit, there was a discussion about it for lemmy-ui, and it was decided to stop showing them because of how psychologically harmful it is.

            We should’ve removed these a long time ago from the API. As a substitute, you can show the post_count and comment_count instead of those scores.

      • @SorteKanin@feddit.dk
        link
        fedilink
        35 months ago

        You need some way to order stuff. How would you prefer to order content if not by votes? Isn’t votes at least a somewhat democratic way to do it? And much like democracy, it might not be great but I have no better ideas.

        • Bob
          link
          fedilink
          25 months ago

          And much like democracy, it might not be great but I have no better ideas.

          Just make me godking of the universe and I’ll put it all right.