I personally am quite against it. I joined Lemmy to stay away from the toxicity on Meta’s platforms. I don’t want any corporate bodies on the fediverse either and possibly doing to the fediverse what Google did to XMPP

      • Norah (pup/it/she)@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        3 years ago

        While I’m sure that one-click hosting for fediverse instances exist, I’d imagine most instance admins would be using general dedicated server hosting. It would allow for finer control of the backend.

        • BlueSharkEnjoyer@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 years ago

          My main mastodon uses one of the hosted services, which I’m totally fine with. Moderating a community is hard enough without adding extra sysadmin work on top, and I’m happy to donate towards the running costs whatever way the admins choose is best to run it.

        • fbievan@fedia.io
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 years ago

          Yeah, I don’t get the comparison of activity pub and xnpp.

          An accurate comparison is email and activity pub

          • riwo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 years ago

            what makes you say that? afaik xmpp and email are very similar, and what happened to xmpp coul very much repeat with email, if we arent careful

    • Xeelee@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      I don’t think they’re there to make money. They want to take over the place and then absorb it in other to eliminate competition. Which is what they’ve always been doing.