A YouTube prankster who was shot by one his targets told jurors Tuesday he had no inkling he had scared or angered the man who fired on him as the prank was recorded.

Tanner Cook, whose “Classified Goons” channel on YouTube has more than 55,000 subscribers, testified nonchalantly about the shooting at start of the trial for 31-year-old Alan Colie, who’s charged with aggravated malicious wounding and two firearms counts.

The April 2 shooting at the food court in Dulles Town Center, about 45 minutes west of Washington, D.C., set off a panic as shoppers fled what they feared to be a mass shooting.

Jurors also saw video of the shooting, recorded by Cook’s associates. The two interacted for less than 30 seconds. Video shows Cook approaching Colie, a DoorDash driver, as he picked up an order. The 6-foot-5 (1.95-meter-tall) Cook looms over Colie while holding a cellphone about 6 inches (15 centimeters) from Colie’s face. The phone broadcasts the phrase “Hey dips—-, quit thinking about my twinkle” multiple times through a Google Translate app.

On the video, Colie says “stop” three different times and tries to back away from Cook, who continues to advance. Colie tries to knock the phone away from his face before pulling out a gun and shooting Cook in the lower left chest.

Cook, 21, testified Tuesday that he tries to confuse the targets of his pranks for the amusement of his online audience. He said he doesn’t seek to elicit fear or anger, but acknowledged his targets often react that way.

Asked why he didn’t stop the prank despite Colie’s repeated requests, Cook said he “almost did” but not because he sensed fear or anger from Colie. He said Colie simply wasn’t exhibiting the type of reaction Cook was looking for.

“There was no reaction,” Cook said.

In opening statements, prosecutors urged jurors to set aside the off-putting nature of Cook’s pranks.

“It was stupid. It was silly. And you may even think it was offensive,” prosecutor Pamela Jones said. “But that’s all it was — a cellphone in the ear that got Tanner shot.”

Defense attorney Tabatha Blake said her client didn’t have the benefit of knowing he was a prank victim when he was confronted with Cook’s confusing behavior.

She said the prosecution’s account of the incident “diminishes how unsettling they were to Mr. Alan Colie at the time they occurred.”

In the video, before the encounter with Colie, Cook and his friends can be heard workshopping the phrase they want to play on the phone. One of the friends urges that it be “short, weird and awkward.”

Cook’s “Classified Goons” channel is replete with repellent stunts, like pretending to vomit on Uber drivers and following unsuspecting customers through department stores. At a preliminary hearing, sheriff’s deputies testified that they were well aware of Cook and have received calls about previous stunts. Cook acknowledged during cross-examination Tuesday that mall security had tossed him out the day prior to the shooting as he tried to record pranks and that he was trying to avoid security the day he targeted Colie.

Jury selection took an entire day Monday, largely because of publicity the case received in the area. At least one juror said during the selection process that she herself had been a victim of one of Cook’s videos.

Cook said he continues to make the videos and earns $2,000 or $3,000 a month. His subscriber base increased from 39,000 before the shooting to 55,000 after.

  • @Luke_Fartnocker@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    661 year ago

    I’m not a proponent of violence, but I think these dipshits need to get their asses beaten every time they do that shit. Maybe, if more of them got beaten or shot, then they would stop being ass fucks.

    I shouldn’t have to be forced to figure out whether someone is a crazy, drug induced murderer, or just some stupid “prankster” every time I go out in public. Rule number 1 in a society is “don’t fuck with strangers”.

    • @Monkstrosity@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      191 year ago

      “Live and let live” are words I live by yet I see the vast majority of people don’t, and the worst of us get fame and money out of it. Humanity sucks.

      • @AA5B@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        91 year ago

        This video is a textbook example of someone knowing appropriate force when defending themselves, and knowing when to stop. Unfortunately.

    • @QuaternionsRock@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      -211 year ago

      I’m not a proponent of violence, but I am a proponent of violence toward “these dipshits”

      I’m not really interested in taking a side here, but if you can’t at least recognize the cognitive dissonance in this statement, there’s nothing anybody can say to you.

      • @JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        171 year ago

        You can think that violence is abhorrent and also understand that it might be the quickest, simplest way to settle a matter. Adults can think two things at once. Crazy, I know.

        • @Castigant@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -191 year ago

          “Violence is abhorrent, except when it’s against people I don’t like”, got it.

            • @iegod@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              -19
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              That’s actually exactly what was said. I don’t condone violence except when I condone violence based on my definition of when I condone violence.

              And you’re all lapping it up. Bravo.

              Edit: and for the record my original comment didn’t even criticize the latter part (the condition or when its condoned). What I am very loudly questioning is the opening statement. Violence is being condoned. The OP is a proponent of violence. Just own it. Don’t be pussies.

              • mihnt
                link
                fedilink
                181 year ago

                Here, I won’t be a pussy.

                Violence is never the answer, until it is.

                Some people don’t know when to stop. What boundaries are. The prankster here found this guy’s boundaries. The victim felt fear, and reacted in his way. Do I get to draw the line in the sand where violence is the right answer? No. Judges, Juries, and lawmakers do.

                Do I feel personally that this gentleman defended himself correctly? It’s a thin line, but yes. As I said in another comment the guy probably ended up in high crime areas on a regular basis and a gun might have been necessary for those situations. So that’s the defense he had on him. It’s not like we all carry a selection of weapons and deterrents that we can choose from depending on where we are at any given time. We carry what works for the worst situation we encounter.

                As a delivery driver myself I sympathize because I have a feeling this wasn’t this guys first bad interaction with another individual. If he continues driving, it most certainly won’t be his last.

          • @JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            81 year ago

            Correction, when it’s against others willing to commit violence, it’s often the only answer.

            Example: Neville Chamberlain, and Winston Churchill

        • Neato
          link
          fedilink
          -231 year ago

          Adults can think two things at once. Crazy, I know.

          We used to call that doublethink. Now we call it the right-wing.

            • Neato
              link
              fedilink
              -111 year ago

              This doesn’t actually say anything. You just don’t like what was said.

              • mihnt
                link
                fedilink
                91 year ago

                No, we all think you’re dumb for dragging idiotic politics into this.

                Some of us think with a rational mind and know it’s not all black and white out there.

                Speaking in absolutes in this world is the worst thing you can do.

                • Neato
                  link
                  fedilink
                  -131 year ago

                  Speaking in absolutes in this world is the worst thing you can do.

                  This is the dumbest fucking thing I’ve heard all day. Congrats. I don’t even have to point out how ironic it is for calling me dumb and then saying this. Bravo.

        • @iegod@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          -231 year ago

          The latter implies being a proponent. Let’s not move goal posts because we think we’re the “good guy”. Hint: you’re not.