A YouTube prankster who was shot by one his targets told jurors Tuesday he had no inkling he had scared or angered the man who fired on him as the prank was recorded.

Tanner Cook, whose “Classified Goons” channel on YouTube has more than 55,000 subscribers, testified nonchalantly about the shooting at start of the trial for 31-year-old Alan Colie, who’s charged with aggravated malicious wounding and two firearms counts.

The April 2 shooting at the food court in Dulles Town Center, about 45 minutes west of Washington, D.C., set off a panic as shoppers fled what they feared to be a mass shooting.

Jurors also saw video of the shooting, recorded by Cook’s associates. The two interacted for less than 30 seconds. Video shows Cook approaching Colie, a DoorDash driver, as he picked up an order. The 6-foot-5 (1.95-meter-tall) Cook looms over Colie while holding a cellphone about 6 inches (15 centimeters) from Colie’s face. The phone broadcasts the phrase “Hey dips—-, quit thinking about my twinkle” multiple times through a Google Translate app.

On the video, Colie says “stop” three different times and tries to back away from Cook, who continues to advance. Colie tries to knock the phone away from his face before pulling out a gun and shooting Cook in the lower left chest.

Cook, 21, testified Tuesday that he tries to confuse the targets of his pranks for the amusement of his online audience. He said he doesn’t seek to elicit fear or anger, but acknowledged his targets often react that way.

Asked why he didn’t stop the prank despite Colie’s repeated requests, Cook said he “almost did” but not because he sensed fear or anger from Colie. He said Colie simply wasn’t exhibiting the type of reaction Cook was looking for.

“There was no reaction,” Cook said.

In opening statements, prosecutors urged jurors to set aside the off-putting nature of Cook’s pranks.

“It was stupid. It was silly. And you may even think it was offensive,” prosecutor Pamela Jones said. “But that’s all it was — a cellphone in the ear that got Tanner shot.”

Defense attorney Tabatha Blake said her client didn’t have the benefit of knowing he was a prank victim when he was confronted with Cook’s confusing behavior.

She said the prosecution’s account of the incident “diminishes how unsettling they were to Mr. Alan Colie at the time they occurred.”

In the video, before the encounter with Colie, Cook and his friends can be heard workshopping the phrase they want to play on the phone. One of the friends urges that it be “short, weird and awkward.”

Cook’s “Classified Goons” channel is replete with repellent stunts, like pretending to vomit on Uber drivers and following unsuspecting customers through department stores. At a preliminary hearing, sheriff’s deputies testified that they were well aware of Cook and have received calls about previous stunts. Cook acknowledged during cross-examination Tuesday that mall security had tossed him out the day prior to the shooting as he tried to record pranks and that he was trying to avoid security the day he targeted Colie.

Jury selection took an entire day Monday, largely because of publicity the case received in the area. At least one juror said during the selection process that she herself had been a victim of one of Cook’s videos.

Cook said he continues to make the videos and earns $2,000 or $3,000 a month. His subscriber base increased from 39,000 before the shooting to 55,000 after.

  • @Someonelol@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    469 months ago

    These prank channels should be completely demonetized to remove the incentive of doing stupid shit like this in the first place.

  • Mossy Feathers (They/Them)
    link
    fedilink
    229 months ago

    I hope Colie goes free and I hope Cook gets sued for everything he has. I don’t know what you’d sue him for, but find something before he gets someone actually killed.

    • @shalafi@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      -11
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      Fuck all that. Attitudes like that are why Americans think they can just blast away. You won’t see my pistol until I’m certain killing you is my very last resort. And if I pull it, it’s because I mean to use it.

      Did this idiot think his life was in danger from an annoying man with a cell phone, in the middle of a fucking food court?! No. He used his gun as a “get off of me” tool. He’s damned lucky Cook survived.

      EDIT: I seriously hope some of you people do not conceal carry. The comments here are terrifying and completely ignorant of case law, attitudes comprised only of feels.

  • Kalash
    link
    fedilink
    89 months ago

    That’s one way to improve content quality on youtube.

    • @bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      -119 months ago

      Eh, at least pranksters are willing to risk something.

      Too much watered-down content on youtube that just exists to suck up time without ever hurting anyone’s feelings.

  • mr_robot
    link
    fedilink
    English
    39 months ago

    Would this have even made trial in a state with “Stand Your Ground” laws?

  • @bobman@unilem.org
    link
    fedilink
    -39 months ago

    Let me guess, they’re telling me about footage without showing me the footage.

    Modern “journalism”, everyone.

      • @SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        -9
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        The person who shot did it directly, without actually showing what was he carrying. Just showing the gun would have had a better effect with no injuries and no arrest, and that already is going over the top.

        You are an asshole for defending getting hurt for this. I want to assume you would not be so eager to go against the kid if it was your family member.

        • @tsonfeir@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          119 months ago

          Are you kidding? Showing the gun to an attacker who is far larger than you is a ridiculous idea. They will just wrestle the gun away. This poor driver got scared out of his wits by a total human trash can who refused to stop when asked. That’s basically rape—of the mind.

          He was attacked. And he defended himself. The YouTuber should be in jail for harassment.

          What world are you living in? Lmfao.

          • @SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            -69 months ago

            And in what backwards world are you living where someone had to risk his life for this. The prankster should be punished for harassment, but doesn’t leave the fact that someone SHOT HIM FOR THAT. Nobody should be shot in a situation like this, period.

            • @tsonfeir@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              99 months ago

              No body should have put the shooter IN this position.

              Don’t go up to people and play loud noises and shove things in their face and keep going even when asked to stop. The YouTuber started it. They should pull his videos, give him community service, and ban him from producing online content for 10 years.

              The driver, the real victim, works a dangerous job and thought he was being attacked. The YouTuber said himself that the videos are designed to confuse and disorient his victims to see how they will react. Well, he found out the hard way what he’s doing is immoral.

              I’m guessing your main problem is the gun itself. I mean, I’m definitely a proponent of gun laws, but I’m smart enough to see who the started it, and who the real victim is.

              • @SSUPII@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                -7
                edit-2
                9 months ago

                I can see that completely too. In fact you nailed my problem and that is with the usage of the gun, nothing else.

                The prankster did absolutely wrong, I never tried to reduce that. But at the same time, was there really no other way to manage the situation? I want to wish there was, but at the same time also cannot know and very likely wasn’t. Still, it won’t remove me from being disappointed that it had to end in injury.

                • @tsonfeir@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  59 months ago

                  No, there is no other way to manage the situation. You cannot ask a victim to pause step back and kindly ask their attacker to stop. tell me, honestly, would you ask a female rape victim to kindly ask their much larger male attacker to stop? Yes, it is the same thing.

        • @SaintWacko@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          99 months ago

          Yeah, I can’t believe that while being threatened by a large, erratically acting man, he didn’t think to calmly try to defuse the situation/s

        • teft
          link
          fedilink
          69 months ago

          Just showing the gun is called brandishing and is illegal. You don’t announce you have a weapon before you shoot someone because you could get shot if you do.

          You are an asshole defending an asshole.

    • @jaamesbaxterr@lemmy.ninja
      link
      fedilink
      English
      169 months ago

      Why do I feel more sympathy for the shooter then? Let me explain myself. I don’t condone his actions, but here’s the thing… You have no idea what a stranger is going through in their life. No idea what trauma lies in their past. Going up to strangers and trying to provoke them could yield wildly different responses from person to person, and in the world we live in that could easily involve anger. Some people are barely holding it together and all they need is a jarring incident like this to make them snap. The shooter didn’t provoke this situation. Yes he reacted poorly, but the entire thing would have been avoided if the brain dead YouTuber wasn’t going around trying to elicit a response for clicks.

  • BruceTwarzen
    link
    fedilink
    -179 months ago

    Spamming the same article around is cool, but is this really news?

    • ZeroCoolOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      11
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      The voting ratio seems to indicate that yes, this is in fact considered a relevant news item by the community but you can and should downvote it if you disagree. Now that we’ve cleared that up, do you have anything to contribute to the discussion or are you just here to whine because I posted an article in two relevant communities?