• @TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    -411 year ago

    Many countries can use that justification. Why are you defending an act that you’d condemn if it was done to America?

    • @TheFonz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      321 year ago

      You’re really committed to the act, even after multiple people have pointed out your error in reading this situation. Kudos to you I guess?

      • @TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -251 year ago

        It’s not an act. I care about this world I live in. I don’t debate to convince the people that disagree with me. I do it to show that those people don’t use logic and reason to decide their beliefs. They want the illusion of confirmation bias. I try to disrupt that illusion. We need to see the world from different perspectives.

        • @NateNate60@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          271 year ago

          I hate that “confirmation bias” have become moo words with people nowadays.

          The logic is pretty sound:

          • A company that does business in the United States must comply with American laws.
          • It is forbidden under American law for a company that operates from the United States to do business with Iran.
          • The company, through its child, shipped oil from Iran.
          • American authorities, enforcing American law, ordered the company to divert the ship and turn over the oil for confiscation because the shipment was illegal.
          • Oil is confiscated.

          I remark that sanctions do not require the approval of the United Nations. Under customary international law, it is an application of sovereign authority. Any country can apply sanctions and can do so in any way you like. What the USA has said is that “if you want to do business here, we forbid you from doing business with Iran”.

          • @frunch@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            101 year ago

            I appreciate you going the distance with that guy. I don’t think they changed their mind, nor do I think they have the capacity to. You certainly kept it on level for us in the peanut gallery though. Cheers!

          • @TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -131 year ago

            You owe me $250 million for using the word “moo.” I sanctioned you 5 hours ago, without your knowledge or approval. You have to do what I want, because I have a bigger stick. I can make up whatever law or sanction I want, and you have to follow it or I’ll destroy your town. Pretzel logic. Call it confirmation bias or sucking your own dick, but that’s what is going on.

            • @NateNate60@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              101 year ago

              I wasn’t aware that you were a sovereign state or that I had any money deposited in your banks or that I do business of any sort with you.

              You can sanction me by putting a permanent embargo on conversing with me by blocking me if you want

              • @TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -41 year ago

                It was an analogy. I don’t want to block you. I want to have an intelligent discussion about the merits of this act. But people just want to defend America despite its despotic acts. It makes me sad.

                • @legion02@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  01 year ago

                  The analogy is closer to you getting banned by a lemmy instance for breaking their rules when replying to comments from another instance. Just because you’re abroad doesn’t mean you’re ungoverned.

                  • @TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    01 year ago

                    There is no governance between states.

                    International law (also known as public international law and the law of nations) is the set of guidelines, norms, and standards usually forming the default behavior between states. Inter means between thus outside of territories thus absent of sovereignty, thus isn’t a law at all (See: Westphalian System) and is rather a common-practice between states - unless they wish otherwise due to their own reasoning. (Source](https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/International_law).

        • @deft@ttrpg.network
          link
          fedilink
          English
          4
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Logic - US said do not do that.

          Reason - They did it.

          If this has insulin, guns, food. You’d probably not care at all. This article would never be written.

            • @hark@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              31 year ago

              Downvoters believe that America is indeed god. That is how far America’s dick is down their throat.

              • @TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                21 year ago

                It’s difficult when you first begin to realize that what you’ve been told is the truth your whole life is lie. It happened to me with the Iraq war and the PNAC report. I try to remain compassionate, because, as an American, I’ve been there. The truth sucks. It’s easier to believe the lies.