They wanted to introduce an non-native species internationally:

https://lemmy.sdf.org/comment/25278185
And I fought against it, and now they banned me:

https://lemmy.ca/u/qrstuv@lemmy.sdf.org
And these are the serial abusers who did it:
@smorks@lemmy.ca @otter@lemmy.ca @TruckBC@lemmy.ca @Shadow@lemmy.ca @mp3@lemmy.ca @recursive_recursion@lemmy.ca
They have a history of abuse: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/52210561


Hey there bud, I’m sorry this happened to y’a, eh! But I think it’s because you tried to export too many downvotes without paying the tariffs!
To be fair, they have made almost 16k downvotes total; 425 just this week. More of a heavy voter in general than a serial downvoter though, as they also make a lot of upvotes (about 2/3 downvotes to 1/3 upvotes) and the downvotes seem to be across a wide range of content.
So this is less serial downvoting, and more just an active user with high standards.
Legit, I’m not sure what ratio I’d be at, but I pepper in a goodly number of downs nowadays because there’s been a shift in off topic posts, and comments that are similarly out of place or just so bad that they merit the mark.
Either that or I’m noticing them more, I dunno. I did take a semi break from lemmy for a while, so maybe that break did shift my awareness of such things.
Way I see it, unless someone is down voting everything, and doing so regularly, that’s part of the point of them existing. It’s a way of weighting the relative merits of a given post or comment. Is it on topic? Is it useful and fitting for the thread/community? Is it nasty enough to be out of line? There’s more reasons to down vote than there are reasons to up, overall.
That’s not how tariffs work, and you know it.