• CanadaPlus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 days ago

    Did somebody actually say tanks were dead after WWI? Tanks were brand new!

    • GardenGeek@europe.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 days ago

      Yes, in fact, some people at the time declared the tank dead for the first time. Trench warfare was a thing of the past, and so the question arose as to why we would still need a vehicle that had only proven its worth through trench warfare (the first tanks were designed to break through heavy defenses and, in particular, to eliminate machine-gun nests).

      These commentators were even correct in that the subsequent wars were no longer trench wars, and the tank diversified beyond its role as a breakthrough vehicle, evolving (among other things) into a system of one-on-one combat over the course of the next major war.

      • CanadaPlus
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 days ago

        Wow, so I guess they were picturing everything reverting back to 19th-century warfare? Or maybe, they were picturing what actually happened, but they didn’t know what to call the heavy, but still fast and maneuverable, gun platforms we now call “tanks”.

        I guess it goes to show that you have to consider what a new military technology adds, as well as what it subtracts.