The term Tankie has a clear definition that Cowbee likes to ignore:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tankie Tankie is a pejorative label generally applied to authoritarian communists, especially those > who support or defend acts of repression by such regimes, their allies, or deny the > occurrence of the events thereof.

Join the lemmy.ml boycott today and help foster a better Lemmy-verse! No more posts, comments (except to counter their propaganda ofc!) or upvotes on any comms on the > Lemmy.ml instance! To make this easy you can do an instance block at Settings > Block Tab > Scroll to bottom > Input “lemmy.ml” and apply

And consider donating to individual instances instead.

Check the megathread for more!

    • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      16 days ago

      Haha, fair! Honestly we could probably ask for one of us to mod c/soviet and then start a This Soviet World reading group, I’d just have to juggle it with what I’m presently reading. That’s not really a problem, I’d just finish my projected set of reading later while moving those up in priority.

      (Picked This Soviet World mostly because it seems like best place to start)

        • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          16 days ago

          Oh, didn’t realize that! I think c/history might be a good place too, c/theory doesn’t mesh well IMO but I already mod it so we can use that if we can’t get it on c/history.

          • c/soviet is open and we’ll get mod if we make a post/comment there. Uh… How do I structure a reading group post? I guess I should start with one to just figure out who wants to be part of it. Also, do you think I should call it ComLib reading group, or just [book] reading group?


            This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

            • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              16 days ago

              Oh, fun questions! I’ve thought a decent bit about this, actually.

              How do I structure a reading group post?

              Assuming it will be you doing the reading group posting (and I think it should be you, after all, ComLib is your project!), I would first make a post gathering interest and advertising the upcoming group, and getting a first wave of notifications. The notifications are critical for longevity.

              Each reading post, IMO, should have the title of the book, chapters, and week number in the title. The post body should have links to the previous weeks, ComLib, and an overview of what the chapters are about.

              Each week should be no more than 1-2 chapters, easily caught up in an hour of reading or so if needed. Being easy to commit to is critical for maintaining the critical mass for a “living” reading group (see how the Capital groups died).

              Also, do you think I should call it ComLib reading group, or just [book] reading group?

              Another great topic. In my opinion, you have a choice. Do you want a ComLib reading group, a Soviet reading group, or general reading groups? In my opinion, having a Soviet reading group would probably start with History of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union (B), Short Course even though it isn’t on ComLib. This gives the context for This Soviet World, as well as the other soviet-related works on ComLib. If you want to do a ComLib reading group, I would go by whatever you most want to share! It’s your site and your work, so this doesn’t need to be as structured.

              I yapped a lot here but I hope it helps! I’d be very up to start reading next week, and I think you should strike while the iron is hot and you’re most motivated. Also, if you want me to lead the reading groups or help in any way, that’s also fine!

              • Each week should be no more than 1-2 chapters, easily caught up in an hour of reading or so if needed. Being easy to commit to is critical for maintaining the critical mass for a “living” reading group (see how the Capital groups died).

                I need to actually also read it myself, so I think I might just start out with 1 chapter.

                Do you want a ComLib reading group, a Soviet reading group, or general reading groups?

                I do kinda wanna make it a ComLib reading group, and actually get round to Cornforth at some point (I’ve been reading it while working on it and it’s pretty good)

                I like your yapping, and it helps.


                This user is suspected of being a cat. Please report any suspicious behavior.

                • Cowbee [he/him, they/them]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  16 days ago

                  Alright, so we have our answers! I was kinda hoping you would say 1 chapter per week, as it’s very easy to commit to. You can always change it up mid-way, there’s no iron law against adjusting (and in fact you should adjust it if you feel it’s too slow).

                  As for being a ComLib-focused reading group, you can name it as such! My sorting-ass wants to put theory in c/theory though so if you want, we can run through the soviet works on c/soviet and then do the theory on c/theory.