CAVOK@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 1 day agoDenmark's Plan to Fight Deepfakes: Give Citizens Copyright to Their Own Likenessgizmodo.comexternal-linkmessage-square39linkfedilinkarrow-up1186arrow-down10cross-posted to: pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
arrow-up1186arrow-down1external-linkDenmark's Plan to Fight Deepfakes: Give Citizens Copyright to Their Own Likenessgizmodo.comCAVOK@lemmy.world to Europe@feddit.orgEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square39linkfedilinkcross-posted to: pulse_of_truth@infosec.pub
minus-squareCanadaPluslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·1 day agoSo is there a fair use exemption for satire?
minus-squaree$tGyr#J2pqM8v@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·10 hours agoIt also would still allow parodies and satire, so some of the standard doctrine of fair use would still apply.
minus-squareCanadaPluslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 hours agoThanks. It’s an interesting approach, and avoids a lot of the funny philosophical questions that comes out of banning just a certain technology.
minus-squareCanadaPluslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 hours agoYou definitely don’t read every article that crosses your feed either. I just wanted to know this one thing.
minus-squaree$tGyr#J2pqM8v@feddit.nllinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·4 hours agoNor should you, no one does. And you’re not alone with this question, seeing the upvotes. So it presumably helped others.
So is there a fair use exemption for satire?
It also would still allow parodies and satire, so some of the standard doctrine of fair use would still apply.
Thanks.
It’s an interesting approach, and avoids a lot of the funny philosophical questions that comes out of banning just a certain technology.
Read the article…
You definitely don’t read every article that crosses your feed either.
I just wanted to know this one thing.
Nor should you, no one does. And you’re not alone with this question, seeing the upvotes. So it presumably helped others.