albigu to technology@hexbear.netEnglish • 1 month agoThe Death of Search | The Atlanticwww.theatlantic.comexternal-linkmessage-square17fedilinkarrow-up143arrow-down10
arrow-up143arrow-down1external-linkThe Death of Search | The Atlanticwww.theatlantic.comalbigu to technology@hexbear.netEnglish • 1 month agomessage-square17fedilink
minus-square@Bureaucrat@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglish41•1 month agojfc please have some dignity, you know you can do better than that
minus-squareOwl [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish33•1 month agoThis restaurant has a terrible food safety rating so I just eat off their floor.
minus-squareBeej JorgensenlinkEnglish2•1 month agoSay how and I’ll do it. Kagi+ChatGPT is getting me the quickest answers.
minus-square@Bureaucrat@hexbear.netlinkfedilinkEnglish17•edit-21 month agoLiterally any thing that isn’t trained on blogspam or notorious for making up shit. You’re basically using a magic 8-ball to “learn” it just repeats what you say back at you. Its useless for research.
minus-squareInevitableSwing [none/use name]linkfedilinkEnglish9•1 month ago Kagi+ChatGPT is getting me the quickest answers. If a human “expert” was a known liar and fantasist who never provided sources or footnotes - would you listen to them? And if you did - why?
minus-squareBeej JorgensenlinkEnglish0•26 days agoDoes listening to them ulitmately get you to the correct answer more quickly on average than not? If so, why aren’t you talking to them?
minus-square@Flocklesscrow@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglish3•1 month ago“I wave my arms blindly in the dark and every so often I touch something before tripping on the furniture”
jfc please have some dignity, you know you can do better than that
This restaurant has a terrible food safety rating so I just eat off their floor.
Say how and I’ll do it. Kagi+ChatGPT is getting me the quickest answers.
Literally any thing that isn’t trained on blogspam or notorious for making up shit. You’re basically using a magic 8-ball to “learn” it just repeats what you say back at you. Its useless for research.
If a human “expert” was a known liar and fantasist who never provided sources or footnotes - would you listen to them? And if you did - why?
Does listening to them ulitmately get you to the correct answer more quickly on average than not? If so, why aren’t you talking to them?
“I wave my arms blindly in the dark and every so often I touch something before tripping on the furniture”