It has been said a gazillion times over the last few months, but is it getting through to those who need to hear it?

  • @xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    742 months ago

    A protest vote to a third party is actually a protest vote to whoever you prefer less. You’re essentially just removing yourself as a voter and making it more likely the person you like less is elected… we often say “third party is a vote for Trump” since most of lemmy is sane - but for a staunch conservative a vote for a third party is a vote for Harris.

    I’d encourage everyone to vote regardless of your leaning - having low voter turnout allows more shitty shenanigans.

    • themeatbridge
      link
      fedilink
      422 months ago

      Yep, we also say that because there are a lot of astroturf accounts pushing Stein and De La Cruz on Lemmy that are hyper-critical of Harris but suspiciously never want to talk about what a shitbag Trump is.

        • @Archer@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          82 months ago

          I’m really encouraged by the fact that universalmonk and return2ozma’s posts get heavily downvoted when they push this slop in Lemmy

      • John Richard
        link
        fedilink
        -282 months ago

        They don’t push them. They just push back against Democrats that invent lies about Stein. It seems most Democrats can’t handle truths about Harris praising and committing to funding war criminals like Netanyahu & Dick Cheney.

        • @acosmichippo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          28
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          we can handle them just fine because the fact of the matter is trump would be way worse for Palestine. There’s a reason Netanyahu prefers Trump.

          • John Richard
            link
            fedilink
            -24
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Stein would be better by your logic because she’d stop sending multibillion dollar thank you checks to Israel whenever they kill American journalists.

            • @acosmichippo@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              232 months ago

              no, because stein is a stooge and has no chance at all of winning anyway. that’s the entire point of the article.

              • John Richard
                link
                fedilink
                -212 months ago

                Why is she a stooge? You don’t like democracy or you scared Kamala supporting war criminals might mean Stein has more of an impact than you’d like to admit?

                • @acosmichippo@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  19
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  She is funded by republicans and has no experience in government whatsoever. She is utterly unqualified for running the most powerful country on earth. She literally only exists to take votes from democrats.

                  • @jordanlund@lemmy.worldM
                    link
                    fedilink
                    22 months ago

                    Now, now… She did win a seat in the Lexington town meeting in 2005. :)

                    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jill_Stein

                    "2005 Lexington Town Meeting

                    In 2005, Stein set her sights locally, running for the Lexington Town Meeting, a representative town meeting, the local legislative body in Lexington, Massachusetts. Stein was elected to one of seven seats in Precinct 2.[156] She finished first of 16 candidates, receiving 539 votes (20.6%). Stein was reelected in 2008, finishing second of 13 vying for eight seats.[157] Stein resigned during her second term to again run for governor.[158]"

                  • John Richard
                    link
                    fedilink
                    -192 months ago

                    Republicans fund Democrat candidates all the time if they think it will help them. It doesn’t mean she is a Republican or has Republican policies. Russians funded Bernie in 2016.

                    Every other candidate exists to take votes from another candidate. She is against funding genocide in Israel.

                    People crave a non-establishment politician. So this whole, she isn’t the “establishment” thing you got going on doesn’t help your case at all. Are you saying she doesn’t have experience on being a corporate puppet like establishment politicians do? And that is a bad thing why?

              • John Richard
                link
                fedilink
                -12 months ago

                No I refuse to support people that are pro genocide. It’s that simple really. I wouldn’t be able to sleep at night knowing that I voted for that. I was going to vote for Kamala but I just can’t do it unless she changes her position before the election.

                • Cethin
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  12 months ago

                  You hopefully won’t be able to sleep at night when things get worse because you refused to get your hands a little dirty doing what’s best.

                  I don’t like to clean dirty dishes, but it’s got to be done sometimes. I’d rather it just go away, but the alternative is much worse. I recognize that doing nothing doesn’t actually accomplish anything, as nice as that feels. I have to just get over it and get it done before things get much worse.

                  • John Richard
                    link
                    fedilink
                    12 months ago

                    I’ll sleep just fine because I stood up and was on the side of humanity and compassion, not the one that was so blind that they voted for the person that praises Dick Cheney and says how she’ll always support genocide.

                  • John Richard
                    link
                    fedilink
                    12 months ago

                    Whatever analogy you’re trying to create, what you’re saying is that you are going to vote to continue funding genocide. Democrats have become the party of the neocons. Not surprising considering Obama would lock up the activists revealing that he US was killing journalists in Iraq.

                • @Soup@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -12 months ago

                  Okay… well, either way- at least we won’t have to hear from you all after November… so, enjoy it while it lasts I guess. We’ll all just see you again in 2028 when you push whoever is running against democratic choice.

                  • John Richard
                    link
                    fedilink
                    0
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    I’m not going anywhere. You’ll be the one to not care about anything until the next election. BTW, it is funny you talk about the Democratic choice in this election.

        • @Soup@lemmy.cafe
          link
          fedilink
          English
          52 months ago

          You men Shill Stein? What lies are being told about Shill Stein? In what way is Shill Stein being besmirched, and how can I add to it?

              • John Richard
                link
                fedilink
                12 months ago

                So being against genocide of Palestinians and Arabic people is now considered MAGAspeak to Democrats?

                • @Soup@lemmy.cafe
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  -2
                  edit-2
                  2 months ago

                  No. Accusing anyone that disagrees with you (reference: gEnOciDe sUpPoRtEr)of something that’s demonstrably false is considered MAGAspeak.

                  News flash:

                  EVERYONE is against genocide bud. You don’t belong to a special grassroots movement of people that keyed in on something that everyone else can’t understand. So drop the smug pseudo-intellectual rhetoric.

                  No one is buying it. And the evidence lies in the ratios. You’re all being downvoted into dust on a platform that supposedly support your ideology.

                  • John Richard
                    link
                    fedilink
                    02 months ago

                    I’m sorry. Somehow sending billions of dollars and 2000 pound bombs to a country that is actively engaged in genocide doesn’t send the message that you’re against genocide. When Kamala loses because she refused to say she’d stop funding genocide, then you’ll blame everyone but the genocide supporter.

      • @basmati@lemmus.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -352 months ago

        Trump admits he’s a shit bag, Harris pretends she’s not.

        Hope whatever shareblue is calling itself these days finally stops getting funded when Harris loses.

        • @davidagain@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          52 months ago

          Trump admits nothing, he just lies and lies and lies and lies and deflects and denies and projects and acuses. What planet are you on that you don’t know this? He’s one of the least humble or self aware men on the whole planet.

          “Trump admits he’s a shitbag” is just another big fat lie.

          YOU admit he’s blatantly a shit bag and then turn right stone and bOtH SideS the whole thing.

          There’s literally nothing honest about Trump. He’s an honesty free zone with an ago the size of a continent, the self awareness of an amoeba and the loyalty of a cosmic ray.

            • @davidagain@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              2
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Because you instead want the worse genocidal racist lying hating minority-bashing blasphemous insurrectionist country-betraying grifter “best king of israel” infantile senile nasty idiot to win. Got it. Two choices: the sane one and the constitution wrecker. You’ve made your choice. Stop pretending it’s because of Harris. It’s because you like his racist shit filled diapers.

              • ArxCyberwolf
                link
                fedilink
                12 months ago

                Just fyi, you’re talking to a self-admitted troll. They’re not worth your time.

                  • @davidagain@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    2
                    edit-2
                    2 months ago

                    Yet here you are, I’m this thread, trolling serious voters with your right wing troll antidemocratic talking points. If it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, hanging a sign saying “swan” round it’s neck isn’t convincing.

              • @basmati@lemmus.org
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -12 months ago

                Nope, neither of them are getting my vote kiddo. Sorry. I know politics are scary this being your first election ever, but there are always more than two choices.

                • @davidagain@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  02 months ago

                  You’re living in more-than-childish naive fake -reality cloud-cuckoo land if you really believe there are more than two choices for who will become president!

                  • @basmati@lemmus.org
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    -12 months ago

                    I’m sorry this is your first election but your anti democratic right wing nonsense isn’t reality.

    • TheHiddenCatboy
      link
      fedilink
      English
      142 months ago

      Yeah, also, Conservatives are more ‘fall in line’ voters, so there’s less vote splitting on the Right than on the Left. Libertarians do appeal to the people opposed to both eyes in the boardroom and eyes in the bedroom on both the Left and the Right, but for the most part, the GQP follows the ‘Vote for the Conservative in the Primary and the Republican in the General’ more than we follow its inverse (replace Conservative with Liberal and Republican with Democrat). And for Republicans afraid of a Trump presidency, come join us and vote for Harris. Then maybe go work on de-Trumping your party after they lose with you helping us. ;)

      • @TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        -42 months ago

        You… do know that the right gets like…. 4x the 3rd party vote compared to the left. Like what you say is 100% false.

        Libertarians+constitution got like 1.2% compared to PSL+greens 0.31% last presidential election iirc.

        But also, if the DNC wanted the 3rd party vote they could simply… court it… instead of pissing on it? To say they cost the vote when the DNC continually shot Bernie in the face in 2016, using funds meant to promote the DNC candidate to campaign against a Democrat candidate makes it FOR SURE THE 3RD PARTY VOTERS FAULT. NOTHING THE DNC COULD HAVE DONE DIFFERENTLY TO NOT LOSE. THEY WERE PERFECT FOR REFUSING TO ADOPT LEGALIZED WEED, SOCIAL PROGRAMS, MEDICARE FOR ALL, ETC. IN FACT, IT IS GOOD THEY ARE STILL REFUSING TO DO SO AND ALSO REFUSING TO JUST NOT GIVE BILLIONS TO SUPPORT AN ACTIVE GENOCIDE. THAT’LL SHOW THIRD PARTY VOTERS THE TRUE MEANING OF DEMOCRACY!

        • @webadict@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          32 months ago

          I like that it’s the Democrats fault for whenever these issues failed, and not the Republicans who universally vote against them. Remove every Republican and I bet we start seeing these issues getting passed.

          • @TowardsTheFuture@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            -32 months ago

            Talking about simply adopting the policy to the DNCs platform, which they won’t. Not about it actually passing, which they still should be able to do but is out of the question when they don’t even want it.