• @HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    5112 hours ago

    For my fellow nerds who are wondering for realsies, you can 512 Polands in the Pacific ocean (although you’d probably have to chop up a few to get them to fit neatly)

    • @CanadaPlus
      link
      English
      3
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      And since a random close 2D packing of disk-like shapes averages around 80%, probably 409 without cutting them.

    • @TAYRN@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      2712 hours ago

      Cool. Now all of us fellow nerds are obsessing over the fact that it’s a perfect power of two.

      • Codex
        link
        fedilink
        English
        811 hours ago

        Turns out, the polandgon (polagon?) has an ideal shape with a perfect binary ratio of area to circumference.

      • @groet@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        57 hours ago

        A coastline may be infinitely long (coastline paradox) but the area of the ocean is not infinitely large.

        Just think about it this way: go close to the coastline while still being 100% certain you are on land. No matter how precise (and therefore long) you measure the coastline, the area of the ocean can never be larger than the area inside of your 100% on land line.

      • Iceblade
        link
        fedilink
        English
        46 hours ago

        Puts up the first terrible map for the lols, somebody inevitably complains (something like this)

        This is a terrible map, the Pacific Ocean can hold more than 16 Polands!

        (whoosh)

        OP puts up the second map to reinforce that this is a gag.

        • noughtnaut
          link
          fedilink
          English
          55 hours ago

          Plus, the 17th Poland was “made room for” by removing New Zealand, a mapping error so common there’s a dedicated sub for it.