• @Overspark@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    111 year ago

    Which problems? As far as I can tell this solves zero problems for users of websites. Wanting to replace captchas with this is just another arms race that normal users will suffer from.

    • @LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      1
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Well, captchas seem likely to become useless in the near future, and are currently a key feature used to prevent unwanted bot activity on many if not most websites. What can replace them?

      Would this technology work better if there were a coalition of attesters that granted access to newer and smaller browsers and os makers?

      • Jajcus
        link
        fedilink
        91 year ago

        The point of the attestation is to show that given browser won’t do some things. If the browser is open source on open source operating system the user can modify it in any way he wants, so not such attestation can be given to such browser.

        Even if we are ok with attested browser being official builds never modified by users, then user could still fake it if they have full control of their operating system. So the operating system must also be attested, so it cannot be freely modified. And what is a point of open source then? You can see, but you cannot touch?

      • conciselyverbose
        link
        fedilink
        41 year ago

        Nothing. Nothing should replace them.

        You, as a website, unconditionally have zero right to know anything about what a user is doing on their computer.

        Block behavior, not devices.

        • @YourAvgMortal@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          11 year ago

          It’s up to the attester to decide. Maybe it needs to run some verifications every so often. There’s nothing preventing it from refusing you attestation too, if your device is out of date, or is too old and won’t receive future updates