SSTF@lemmy.world to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 年前Hot off the presseslemmy.worldimagemessage-square125linkfedilinkarrow-up1700arrow-down110
arrow-up1690arrow-down1imageHot off the presseslemmy.worldSSTF@lemmy.world to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish · 2 年前message-square125linkfedilink
minus-squareCanadaPluslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 年前I’m guessing the tradeoff is less armour and other survivability features. The Abrams is designed to remain survivable even if the ammo cooks off IIRC, which must add an insane amount to both the weight and the cost.
I’m guessing the tradeoff is less armour and other survivability features. The Abrams is designed to remain survivable even if the ammo cooks off IIRC, which must add an insane amount to both the weight and the cost.