SSTF to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 1 month agoHot off the presseslemmy.worldimagemessage-square127fedilinkarrow-up1691arrow-down110
arrow-up1681arrow-down1imageHot off the presseslemmy.worldSSTF to NonCredibleDefense@sh.itjust.worksEnglish • 1 month agomessage-square127fedilink
minus-square@CanadaPluslinkEnglish4•1 month agoI’m guessing the tradeoff is less armour and other survivability features. The Abrams is designed to remain survivable even if the ammo cooks off IIRC, which must add an insane amount to both the weight and the cost.
I’m guessing the tradeoff is less armour and other survivability features. The Abrams is designed to remain survivable even if the ammo cooks off IIRC, which must add an insane amount to both the weight and the cost.