1. never signed up for anything like this,
  2. never donated to or signed up for emails from the DNC, et al.,
  3. political texts like this come all the time, and
  4. I hesitate to reply “stop” because I don’t want them to know this is a live number (is my instinct here outdated/inapplicable?)
    • @ByteOnBikes@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      12
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      As a Democrat, I agree.

      But I kinda want to see how deep this goes.

      WhiteDudesWhoLikeFriesInTheirMilkshakes4Harris .com

      PuertoRicansWhoAreOkayWithTacoBell4Harris .com

      BlackAnimeFansWhoAreCasualFansNotLikeThatWeirdShitLikeMyWifeIsADogFromAnotherWorld4Harris .com

    • @CanadaPlus
      link
      English
      4
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      It’s a pretty relevant distinction within American life. I’m no strategist, but it doesn’t seem unreasonable.

        • @CanadaPlus
          link
          English
          23 months ago

          It’s a social construct that didn’t exist until the 1600s, but it’s a real social construct.

          Outside America and other former plantation economies it can be a bit different, and less in-your-face, but it’s almost always still there.

          • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            13 months ago

            It’s not purely a social construct, I hate this stupid idea. It’s a phenotype. Babies do not have a randomized skin color at birth, it depends on their ancestry. Calling that a “social construct” is arguably racist in itself.

            • @CanadaPlus
              link
              English
              33 months ago

              Skin colour is a complete continuum, and one which doesn’t very in any uniform way based on geography, aside from the darkest people coming recently from Africa.

              By this logic, ear size is a race.

              • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                -13 months ago

                Yes! You’re getting it. Ear size is an aspect of race. As is hair texture and height and all the other inheritable phenotypes. Skin color is just the most visibly obvious one.

                • @barsoap@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  3
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  So you’re saying race == phenotype? Then you also have to say that race is a continuum, and, therefore, any arbitrary line on that continuum a social construct.

                  Which is btw blindingly obvious to Europeans, Harris is white in my book: There’s plenty of Italians with darker skin. Funny how perception changes if you actually consider skin colour to be skin colour and not some grand overarching signifier for an in reality culturally defined group.

                  • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    13 months ago

                    Then you also have to say that race is a continuum, and, therefore, any arbitrary line on that continuum a social construct.

                    Well by that definition fucking everything is a social construct. Which, sure, there’s a decent philosophical argument that even reality is a social construct, but it makes it impossible to discuss anything if you get hung up on that.

                    I’ve got a secret to let you in on: aside from mathematics and some physics, literally everything is categorized based on arbitrary lines on a continuum. Taxonomic classification. Whether an object is a planet or not. “Ocean” vs “sea”. Macro vs micro economics. Every single thing that is classified, a person or group of persons had to make a decision and in some cases that decision was not very clear or easy.

                    That doesn’t mean it’s a pure social construct, and it definitely doesn’t mean the categories are invalid. It means they’re blurry at the boundaries, like all things are. It means they’re part of a continuum, like all things are. It does NOT mean or imply that the categories are invalid.

                • @CanadaPlus
                  link
                  English
                  1
                  edit-2
                  3 months ago

                  Well, words can mean whatever you want, but usually race refers to the discrete-ish social categories that have been constructed based roughly on specific phenotypes. For example Black people were a discrete legal category for most of America’s history, and were nominally 3/5 of a person and treated as much less. Now, they have equal legal rights on paper, but the category remains informally.

                  • @Cryophilia@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    13 months ago

                    That’s an academic ivory tower definition that they invented and no one else uses. Even the blatant racists who sorted races into these social categories did so based on physical appearance. You didn’t see any dark skin people allowed to use facilities that said “whites only”.

                    It’s based on physical appearance, which is based on phenotype.

      • @StaySquared@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        03 months ago

        I don’t need to… I don’t care about people’s skin color or race or religion or ethnicity or their nationalities. That doesn’t define an individual.

        • @enbyecho@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          13 months ago

          Sure, right. Because I’m sure you are free and clear of centuries of systemic white supremacy… Uh huh.