InevitableSwing [none/use name] to technology@hexbear.netEnglish • 1 month ago2,500 pages of internal documentation were leaked from Google.www.theverge.comexternal-linkmessage-square14fedilinkarrow-up174arrow-down10cross-posted to: becomeme@sh.itjust.workstechnology@lemmy.ziphackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnology@lemmy.world
arrow-up174arrow-down1external-link2,500 pages of internal documentation were leaked from Google.www.theverge.comInevitableSwing [none/use name] to technology@hexbear.netEnglish • 1 month agomessage-square14fedilinkcross-posted to: becomeme@sh.itjust.workstechnology@lemmy.ziphackernews@lemmy.smeargle.fanstechnology@lemmy.world
minus-squareDeadend [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish4•1 month agoIt will potentially damage pagerank. But hey, Google just launched AI search, which is hated because it’s garbage and gives bad results. They can’t make the AI better, so they will make everything else worse.
minus-squareFunkyStuff [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 month agoBut how do they make money off of this? Do they start selling AI search with a better model?
minus-squareDeadend [he/him]linkfedilinkEnglish3•1 month agoGoogle has a near monopoly and spends a lot of money to stay that way. They get money from ads that appear on pages. It’s also a company with many factions. Burning down search a little is bad For the company… but good for the AI people.
It will potentially damage pagerank. But hey, Google just launched AI search, which is hated because it’s garbage and gives bad results.
They can’t make the AI better, so they will make everything else worse.
But how do they make money off of this? Do they start selling AI search with a better model?
Google has a near monopoly and spends a lot of money to stay that way.
They get money from ads that appear on pages.
It’s also a company with many factions. Burning down search a little is bad For the company… but good for the AI people.