ooszyj
- 7 Posts
- 26 Comments
2·17 小时前Great, thanks for pointing to the jmail one instead 👍
Also covered in CNN, and shared here earlier today:
~~https://lemmy.world/post/43230228~~ (that takes me to another (wrong) post.
This link should work: https://mander.xyz/post/47568270
Excellent.
Also, that April 7 exchange isn’t on the DOJ website anymore:
https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/DataSet 10/EFTA01990936.pdf
Some excellent sleuthing right there. Thanks for doing that digging.
The github repo in the first listing has been turned into a website now, by the author:
He’s been examining the releases over a longer period. Check out videos on his voidzilla YouTube channel for some quality investigative work on what has been made public so far.
It’s quite well documented who’s behind jmail and the associated sites:
Stephen Findeisen (Coffeezilla) is among the contributors, which in my opinion gives it very high credibility and trustworthyness.
Exactly. It’s also refreshingly free from sensationalist claims of this, that or the other. It straightforwardly states what’s documented, how these documents are connected, and how these documents connect people and actions.
It poses critical questions and criticism of how investigations were done, and not done, how leads were not followed, and how redactions have been made that there seemingly are no legal grounds for.
The work this guy has put into it is pretty impressive. I know he’s been assisted by LLMs, but it still gets around a lot of avenues of exploration. I especially like the document that summarizes the institutional failures that are the thickest red lines throughout the Epstein case:
Jesus Christ what a bunch of pedo apologists.
That document is a wild ride.
Presumably Bella Klein, no?
So what does this mean? Bella Klein was sending packages from the account she was an admin for, and paying for it with funds from the Epstein estate?
Nuara might be an NYPD detective mentioned in early cases against Epstein (https://github.com/rhowardstone/Epstein-research/blob/main/individuals%2FKHANNA_SIX_NAMES_INVESTIGATION.md)
I updated the post body with this info. Looks like one person besides Lesley Wexner is referring to an NYPD detective.
I’m not sure why the article only lists 5, when he mentions 6 in the video, and also mentions there are 6 in the article, but doesn’t list him.
Plenty of grounds for another conspiracy.
It seems like writing these messages were never his primary focus when he was actually typing them. It’s impressive, just didn’t care I guess, someone else’s problem.
Research consultant? It would sure be nice to know what Epstein was sending him in those packages for 4 years.
Ok, so they can take notes. But they can’t be used as evidence for anything I assume? DOJ can just say, “well you must’ve written the wrong document ID in your notes, because that document doesn’t say what your notes says it does.”
That they can’t bring staff members who have been researching the issue is also an odd restriction. As a member of congress, you can go there and look at a tiny sample of 3+ million files, potentially make some handwritten notes. I doubt many members of congress have spent the majority of their last 10 days digging into the files to find lines of investigation into specific files, They do have other things to do, so the restriction for them to not bring anyone who are more familiar with the files simply seems like another roadblock for this exercise to be useful to anybody.
Glad to see another line of investigation opened by the British police forces.